Key result
Highest systemic proportional pulse index quartile linked to ~136% greater risk of incident dementia.
Why the study?
Pulse pressure is associated with cognitive decline but fails to account for inter-individual body size differences that influence vascular load.
Is higher systemic proportional pulse index (SPI) associated with an increased risk of incident probable dementia?
Cohort (n=6,070)
Is higher systemic proportional pulse index (SPI) associated with an increased risk of incident probable dementia?
Systemic proportional pulse index (SPI) is independently associated with incident probable dementia, providing modest incremental prognostic value beyond standard pulse pressure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating in this observational cohort; leaves open whether pulse index improves dementia prediction beyond established risks.
Background Pulse pressure (PP) is associated with cognitive decline but does not account for inter-individual differences in body size that may influence vascular load. We evaluated whether the systemic proportional pulse index (SPI), a body size-indexed pulsatile measure, is associated with incident probable dementia in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial Memory and Cognition in Decreased Hypertension (SPRINT-MIND). Methods We conducted a post-hoc analysis of SPRINT-MIND participants with complete baseline blood pressure and anthropometric data. SPI was calculated as PP indexed to the body surface area. The primary outcome was incident probable dementia adjudicated using standardized SPRINT-MIND protocols. Cox proportional hazards models evaluated associations between SPI and dementia after adjustment for demographic and clinical covariates. Incremental prognostic value was assessed using Harrell’s C-index and Akaike Information Criterion. Results Among 6,070 participants (mean age, 63.2±6.0 years; 65.7% male), 110 (1.8%) developed probable dementia during follow-up. Higher SPI was independently associated with increased dementia risk in models adjusting for PP and body surface area (p=0.031). Participants in the highest SPI quartile had greater risk compared with the lowest quartile (hazard ratio, 2.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-4.39). Addition of SPI modestly improved model discrimination and fit beyond PP alone. Conclusions SPI is independently associated with incident probable dementia and provides modest incremental prognostic information beyond standard clinical factors and PP, suggesting that incorporating body size into assessment of pulsatile load may refine vascular risk stratification for cognitive outcomes, pending external validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mazimba et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Hypertension (n=6,070). Systemic proportional pulse index (SPI) vs. Lowest SPI quartile was evaluated on Incident probable dementia (HR 2.36, 95% CI 1.27-4.39, p=0.031). Participants in the highest quartile of systemic proportional pulse index had a greater risk of incident probable dementia compared with the lowest quartile.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: