Key result
HFpEF in women undergoing AF ablation is linked to ~4-fold higher AF re-hospitalization.
Why the study?
Female sex is associated with increased HFpEF prevalence and reduced efficacy of AF catheter ablation, but outcomes after cryoballoon ablation in women with versus without HFpEF required evaluation.
Does the presence of HFpEF worsen clinical and functional outcomes after cryoballoon-ablation of atrial fibrillation in women?
Observational (n=42)
No
Does the presence of HFpEF worsen clinical and functional outcomes after cryoballoon-ablation of atrial fibrillation in women?
Absolute Event Rate: 36.8% vs 9.1%
p-value: p=0.039
Women with HFpEF may face higher AF-related rehospitalization and persistent symptoms after cryoballoon ablation; leaves open need for targeted, sex-specific strategies in prospective trials.
Background Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) often coincide. Female sex is associated with both increased prevalence of HFpEF and reduced therapeutic efficacy of catheter ablation of AF. This sub-analysis of the previously published AFFECT-study evaluates outcome after cryoballoon-ablation in women with and without HFpEF. Methods One-hundred-and-two patients (LVEF ≥ 50%) scheduled for cryoballoon-ablation of AF were prospectively enrolled. Forty-two were female. Comprehensive baseline assessment included echocardiography, stress echocardiography, six-minute-walk-test, biomarker- and quality-of-life-assessment (QoL, SF-36), and was repeated at follow-up ≥12 months after AF-ablation. Baseline parameters, procedural characteristics and outcome after AF-ablation were compared between women with and without HFpEF. Results Women with HFpEF ( n = 20) were characterized by higher median left atrial volume index (35.8 ml/m 2 vs. 25.8 ml/m 2 , P < 0.001), left ventricular hypertrophy (median left ventricular mass index: 92.0 g/m 2 vs. 83.0 g/m 2 , P = 0.027), reduced distance in the 6-min-walk-test (median: 453 m vs. 527 m, P = 0.008) and higher left atrial pressures (median: 14.0 mmHg vs.9.5 mmHg, P = 0.008) compared to women without HFpEF ( n = 21). During follow-up, HFpEF-patients more often experienced AF-related re-hospitalization (36.8% vs. 9.1%, P = 0.039) and numerically higher AF-recurrence-rates (57.9% vs. 31.1%, P = 0.109). There was no significant improvement of heart failure-related symptoms, echocardiographic parameters and cardiac biomarkers levels. QoL showed no significant improvement in both subgroups. Women with HFpEF still exhibited a lower SF-36 Physical Component Summary Score vs. women without HFpEF (median: 41.2 vs. 52.1, P < 0.001). Conclusion Women with HFpEF constitute a distinct subgroup with high rates of AF-related events after AF-ablation, and persistence of both symptoms and functional hallmarks of HFpEF. Consideration of sex-specific cardiac co-morbidities is crucial for personalization and optimization of AF-therapy. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05603611.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zylla et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (n=42). Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) vs. No heart failure was evaluated on AF-related re-hospitalization (p=0.039). Women with HFpEF undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation had a significantly higher rate of AF-related re-hospitalization compared to women without heart failure (36.8% vs 9.1%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: