In patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation, those with HFpEF had a significantly higher rate of AF recurrence compared to those without heart failure (57% vs 23%, P=0.003).
Cohort (n=102)
Does the presence of HFpEF worsen clinical and functional outcomes after cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation compared to patients without heart failure?
Patients with HFpEF undergoing cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation have significantly higher recurrence rates and persistent functional impairment compared to patients without heart failure.
Absolute Event Rate: 57% vs 23%
p-value: p=0.003
Background: Coexistence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is common, affecting morbidity and prognosis. This study evaluates outcome after cryoballoon ablation for AF in HFpEF compared with patients without heart failure. Methods: A total of 102 AF patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% undergoing cryoballoon ablation were prospectively enrolled. Baseline evaluation included echocardiography, stress echocardiography, 6-minute walk test, biomarkers, and quality of life assessment (Short-Form-36). Procedural parameters and clinical, functional and echocardiographic end points at follow-up ≥12 months after AF ablation were compared between patients with and without HFpEF. Results: Patients with HFpEF (n=24) were older (median, 74 years versus 65 years; P =0.001) more often female (83% versus 28%; P <0.001) and characterized by more pronounced AF-related symptoms (median European Heart Rhythm Association score 3 versus 2; P <0.001), higher left atrial pressures (median, 14 mm Hg versus 10 mm Hg; P =0.008), reduced left atrial-appendage velocity (median, 36 cm/s versus 59 cm/s; P <0.001), and reduced distance in the 6-minute walk test (median, 488 m versus 539 m; P <0.001). Patients with HFpEF more often experienced AF recurrence (57% versus 23%; P =0.003), repeat AF ablation (39% versus 14%; P =0.01) and AF-related rehospitalization (26% versus 7%; P =0.016). Heart failure symptoms and elevated cardiac biomarkers persisted, even in patients with HFpEF with successful rhythm control at follow-up. Echocardiographic follow-up showed progression of adverse left atrial remodeling and no relevant improvement in diastolic function in HFpEF. Quality of life improved in patients without HFpEF, whereas patients with HFpEF still exhibited a lower physical component summary score (median, 41.5 versus 53.4; P <0.004). Conclusions: Patients with HFpEF constitute a distinct subgroup with elevated risk for AF recurrence after cryoballon ablation. Functional hallmarks of HFpEF persist, irrespective of rhythm status at follow-up. Future research is needed to optimize treatment strategies in patients with HFpEF. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04317911.
Zylla et al. (Thu,) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (n=102). Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) vs. No heart failure was evaluated on Atrial fibrillation recurrence (p=0.003). In patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation, those with HFpEF had a significantly higher rate of AF recurrence compared to those without heart failure (57% vs 23%, P=0.003).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: