Key result
Constant TR pacing and constant DI pacing both prevented alternans onset at lower basic cycle lengths than periodic pacing, with TR pacing showing greater control at longer cable lengths.
Why the study?
The efficacy of local constant diastolic interval (DI) pacing versus global constant TR pacing in preventing cardiac alternans formation had never been investigated.
Does ECG-based constant TR pacing prevent cardiac alternans better than constant DI pacing in a 1D numerical model of human ventricular tissue?
Does ECG-based constant TR pacing prevent cardiac alternans better than constant DI pacing in a 1D numerical model of human ventricular tissue?
Global constant TR pacing may offer superior control of cardiac alternans compared to local constant DI pacing in extended ventricular tissue models.
Constant TR pacing may enhance alternans control in extended tissue models; leaves open translation to clinical arrhythmia prevention.
Cardiac alternans is a proarrhythmic state in which the action potential duration (APD) of cardiac myocytes alternate between long and short values and often occurs under conditions of rapid pacing of cardiac tissue. In the ventricles, alternans is especially dangerous due to the life-threatening risk of developing arrhythmias, such as ventricular fibrillation. Alternans can be formed in periodically paced tissue as a result of pacing itself. Recently, it has been demonstrated that this pacing-induced alternans can be prevented by performing constant diastolic interval (DI) pacing, in which DI is independent of APD. However, constant DI pacing is difficult to implement in experimental settings since it requires the real-time measurement of APD. A more practical way was proposed based on electrocardiograms (ECGs), which give an indirect measure of the global DI relaxation period through the TR interval assessment. Previously, we demonstrated that constant TR pacing prevented alternans formation in isolated Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts. However, the efficacy of "local" constant DI pacing vs "global" constant TR pacing in preventing alternans formation has never been investigated. Thus, the purpose of this study was to implement an ECG-based constant TR pacing in a 1D numerical model of human ventricular tissue and to compare the dynamical behavior of cardiac tissue with that resulted from a constant DI pacing. The results showed that both constant TR and constant DI pacing prevented the onset of alternans until lower basic cycle length when compared to periodic pacing. For longer cable lengths, constant TR pacing was shown to exhibit greater control on alternans than constant DI pacing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thakare et al. (2020) studied Cardiac alternans. Constant TR pacing vs. Constant DI pacing and periodic pacing was evaluated on Prevention of alternans onset. Constant TR pacing and constant DI pacing both prevented alternans onset at lower basic cycle lengths than periodic pacing, with TR pacing showing greater control at longer cable lengths.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: