Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates accurate standardization of breast radiotherapy nomenclature, suggesting improved efficiency in clinical workflows.
Standardized nomenclature for radiotherapy (RT) organs-at-risk (OARs) and target volumes (TVs) is essential for using large retrospective imaging and treatment-planning datasets. However, clinical structure names vary substantially across centres, making manual standardization time-consuming and resource-intensive. This study aims to develop a transformer-based multimodal model to automatically standardize the breast RT structure names into protocol-standard labels by combining raw clinical-use text, image features, transformer-derived spatial context, and geometric features. The model was trained and internally validated on a curated dataset from a single centre comprising 1436 breast cancer RT patients, and externally tested on 463 patients from five independent centres. During internal validation, the full multimodal model achieved a weighted F1-score of 98.08 ± 0.09%. Across the five external centres, the full model achieved weighted F1-scores ranging from 87.75% to 95.40%, with OAR accuracy reaching 100% in most centres and 96% in one centre. For primary and nodal TVs, external accuracy ranged from 80% to 97%. With reduced training data, the transformer-based model outperformed the CNN baseline when trained using 50%–80% of the available training data, with the largest difference observed at 50% training data (88.12% vs 75.36% weighted F1). These results support transformer-based multimodal learning as a scalable approach for retrospective RT nomenclature standardization, with potential application in clinical quality assurance workflows, offering a substantial reduction in manual effort and time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alam et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: