Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Critical analysis of John Caputo's radical theology reveals key issues with his conceptualization of the event.
John Caputo’s ‘radical theology’ calls attention to the event stirring in the name of God. He utilizes a certain reduction in order to bring this into view which has developed from a Husserlian to a ‘radical’ form. I argue that his thematizing of the event is an important point of emphasis in post-modern philosophy of religion but that his reduction suffers from three problems. It presupposes that any theological discourse in terms of being is onto-theological, it relies on a naturalistic binary of possibility and impossibility to exclude the miraculous, and this strangely determinate horizon of possibility inhibits the givenness of the event. Caputo’s deconstructive concern for the event in the name of God could ironically be further radicalized by not employing his radical reduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jameson Cockerell (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: