Examines the relationship between evil and non-personal ultimate realities, suggesting implications for theism.
Most discussion of the problem of evil focuses on the probability of theism (understood as the existence of an omnibenevolent, omnipotent God) and naturalism. This paper examines how the existence of evil bears on the probability of a non-personal ultimate reality such as Brahman or the Dao. It further argues that different kinds of evil provide evidential support for certain forms of theism, while offering no support for the existence of a non-personal ultimate reality. However, other forms of evil disconfirm theism and do not affect the probability of a non-personal ultimate reality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hans Van Eyghen (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: