Key result
Multidetector computed tomography angiography measured significantly longer coronary lesion lengths compared to quantitative coronary angiography (mean difference 8.8 mm, p<0.001).
Why the study?
Does multidetector computed tomography angiography (CTA) assess coronary lesion length differently than quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) in patients undergoing PCI?
Observational (n=83)
Blinded observers
No
Does multidetector computed tomography angiography (CTA) assess coronary lesion length differently than quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) in patients undergoing PCI?
CTA assesses coronary lesion length as significantly longer than QCA, which may provide a more accurate evaluation of plaque extent and improve PCI guidance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CTA lesion lengths exceed QCA by ~9 mm; hypothesis-generating for CTA-guided PCI, requiring prospective validation before practice change.
Multidetector computed tomography angiography (CTA) provides information on plaque extent and stenosis in the coronary wall. More accurate lesion assessment may be feasible with CTA as compared to invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Accordingly, lesion length assessment was compared between ICA and CTA in patients referred for CTA who underwent subsequent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). 89 patients clinically referred for CTA were subsequently referred for ICA and PCI. On CTA, lesion length was measured from the proximal to the distal shoulder of the plaque. Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) was performed to analyze lesion length. Stent length was recorded for each lesion. In total, 119 lesions were retrospectively identified. Mean lesion length on CTA was 21.4 ± 8.4 mm and on QCA 12.6 ± 6.1 mm. Mean stent length deployed was 17.4 ± 5.3 mm. Lesion length on CTA was significantly longer than on QCA (difference 8.8 ± 6.7 mm, P < 0.001). Moreover, lesion length visualized on CTA was also significantly longer than mean stent length (CTA lesion length-stent length was 4.2 ± 8.7 mm, P < 0.001). Lesion length assessed by CTA is longer than that assessed by ICA. Possibly, CTA provides more accurate lesion length assessment than ICA and may facilitate improved guidance of percutaneous treatment of coronary lesions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Velzen et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (n=83). Multidetector computed tomography angiography (CTA) vs. Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) was evaluated on Coronary lesion length (MD 8.8 mm, p=<0.001). Multidetector computed tomography angiography measured significantly longer coronary lesion lengths compared to quantitative coronary angiography (mean difference 8.8 mm, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: