Key result
CCTA measures lower stenosis grades than QCA in ambiguous left main coronary artery disease.
Why the study?
Left main coronary artery stenosis may be misjudged by coronary angiography, creating uncertainty in diagnosis for borderline lesions.
Does CCTA provide complementary diagnostic information compared to QCA in patients with ambiguous left main coronary artery disease?
Case Report (n=5)
Does CCTA provide complementary diagnostic information compared to QCA in patients with ambiguous left main coronary artery disease?
CCTA may have a complementary diagnostic role in assessing angiographically ambiguous left main coronary artery lesions, often showing lower stenosis grades than QCA.
Caution advised with CCTA stenosis grading in ambiguous left main lesions; leaves open complementary role pending prospective validation.
Left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis is a high risk subset of coronary artery disease; however, its occurrence may be misjudged by coronary angiography. Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) was performed on 5 patients with clinically highly suspicious and angiographically borderline LMCA disease (ostial: 3 patients, mid: 1 patient and distal: 1 patient). A cross-sectional CCTA image was used to calculate the diameter stenosis. The quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) reference diameter (RD) correlated well with CCTA RD in all 5 patients. However, the lesion site minimal lumen diameter (MLD) by QCA correlated less well with that obtained by CCTA. The grade of stenosis measured by CCTA was significantly lower than that measured by QCA. Morphologically, three patients had LMCA ostial angulation (with minimal atheromatous changes), one patient had a biconcave configuration of the LMCA (with normal vessel wall) and one other had a tapering-morphology of the LMCA (with minimal atheromatous changes). In conclusion, CCTA may have a complementary diagnostic role in patients with angiographically ambiguous or inconclusive LMCA lesions and therefore it should be considered in the assessment of selected patients before they undergo coronary bypass surgery. In order to validate CCTA for main stem stenosis a proper gold standard, such as IVUS, is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zeina et al. (2008) conducted a case report in Ambiguous Left Main Coronary Artery Disease (n=5). Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) vs. Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) was evaluated on Grade of stenosis and minimal lumen diameter (MLD). Coronary CT angiography measured significantly lower grades of stenosis compared to quantitative coronary angiography in patients with ambiguous left main coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: