Key result
Adding edge-to-edge repair to septal myectomy in HOCM is linked to ~38% lower maximum LVOT gradients.
Why the study?
To evaluate the early and long-term clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of adding edge-to-edge mitral valve repair to septal myectomy in patients with symptomatic HOCM.
Does adding edge-to-edge mitral valve repair to septal myectomy improve clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in patients with symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy?
Cohort (n=76)
No
Does adding edge-to-edge mitral valve repair to septal myectomy improve clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in patients with symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Adding surgical edge-to-edge mitral valve repair to septal myectomy in HOCM patients is safe and provides excellent functional improvement and relief of LVOT obstruction comparable to isolated myectomy.
This study evaluates the early and long-term clinical and echocardiographic outcome of edge-to-edge (E2E) mitral valve repair (MVr) concomitant to septal myectomy (SM) in patients with symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM). A retrospective single-center analysis was performed of patients who underwent isolated SM or SM with E2E MVr from 2011 to 2022. Exclusion criteria were primary mitral valve (MV) disease or concomitant valve surgery. Early and long-term safety, functional and echocardiographic outcomes were compared between groups. Between January 2011 and April 2022, 76 consecutive patients underwent SM for HOCM: 42 patients (55%) underwent SM without additional E2E MVr (Group 1) and 34 patients (45%) underwent SM with additional E2E MVr (Group 2). At latest follow-up, 87% of patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I-II with no significant differences in NYHA class between groups. Incidence of safety events was comparable between groups. Echocardiographic relief of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction was comparable at early follow-up (P = 0.68), with a significant but small difference in maximum LVOT pressure gradient at latest follow-up in favor of E2E MVr (P = 0.04). Furthermore, patients who underwent SM with E2E MVr showed less residual systolic anterior motion at early and latest follow-up (P = 0.020; P = 0.178). Reintervention on the MV was absent in both groups at 1 year and equally low at follow-up (P = 0.27). This study demonstrates that adding E2E MVr to septal myectomy is as safe as isolated myectomy for the treatment of HOCM. Moreover, the addition of E2E MVr is associated with similar excellent functional improvement and freedom from MV reintervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hegeman et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy (n=76). Septal myectomy with edge-to-edge mitral valve repair vs. Isolated septal myectomy was evaluated on Maximum LVOT pressure gradient at latest follow-up (p=0.041). Adding edge-to-edge mitral valve repair to septal myectomy in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy reduced maximum LVOT gradient at latest follow-up (5.9 vs 9.5 mmHg, p=0.041) with similar safety.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: