Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective analysis identifies elevated serum IgA as a predictor of extra-articular manifestations in axial spondyloarthritis, indicating its clinical utility.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether serum immunoglobulin A (IgA) identifies an extra-articular-prone phenotype in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and assess its clinical utility. METHOD: We retrospectively analysed 402 patients with axSpA. Elevated IgA was defined as > 4.0 g/L. Associations with extra-articular manifestations (EAMs) were evaluated by logistic regression, and time to first EAM by Kaplan-Meier and Cox models. Discrimination and clinical utility were assessed. RESULTS: During follow-up, 45.5% of patients developed ≥1 EAM and 8.7% developed ≥2. Elevated IgA occurred in 15.0% overall but was more common in patients with multiple EAMs (40.6%) than in those without (10.9%) or with a single EAM (14.7%); corresponding odds ratios were 5.57 (95% CI 2.41-12.89, p < 0.001) and 3.98 (1.66-9.54). Elevated IgA predicted ≥2 EAMs with 40.6% sensitivity, 89.0% specificity, and an area under the curve of 0.65, rising to 0.78 when combined with C-reactive protein (CRP). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed reduced EAM-free survival with elevated IgA (p = 0.008). In Cox models, elevated IgA independently predicted incident EAMs (hazard ratio 2.28, 95% CI 1.18-4.40, p = 0.014). Decision-curve analysis indicated a positive net benefit. Crohn's disease was overrepresented among patients with elevated IgA (33.3% vs 11.4%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Elevated serum IgA delineates an intestinally biased, extra-articular-prone axSpA phenotype and provides actionable information beyond CRP, supporting the integration of IgA-based risk stratification into EAM surveillance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pistone et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: