Study optimizes fuel injection strategy for reduced emissions in high-power diesel engines, suggesting a path toward sustainability.
Diesel engines remain the backbone of the rail cargo sector, where maximizing fuel efficiency is critical for sustainability. This study optimizes the fuel injection strategy of a high-power locomotive engine, representative of those operating on 900 km rail corridors in Brazil, by investigating the synergy between fuel injection timing and spray angle ( β ). Numerical simulations were performed at a constant engine speed of 996 revolutions per minute (RPM) using computational fluid dynamics with the Extended Coherent Flame Model 3-Zones (ECFM-3Z) and the κ - ζ - f turbulence model. A parametric study of 25 configurations was conducted, varying the spray angle from 153.0 to 167.0 ∘ and injection timing from 698 to 706 Crank Angle (CA) degrees, referenced against a 160.0 ∘ /702 CA baseline. Results demonstrate that advancing injection to 698 CA enhances Indicated Power and Brake Mean Effective Pressure (BMEP) by up to 2.92%, though at the cost of a 42.4% increase in Nitrogen Oxide (NO) emissions. Conversely, wider spray angles ( β = 167.0 ∘ ) resulted in spray-bowl misalignment, increasing soot by up to 168% and Brake Specific Fuel Consumption (BSFC) by 9.47%. A critical trade-off was identified: while narrow angles (153.0–156.5 ∘ ) improve mixing through higher turbulent kinetic energy, delaying injection to 706 CA with a 160.0 ∘ angle yields a simultaneous reduction in NO (22.3%) and soot (28.2%) with a marginal BMEP penalty of only 1.33%. These findings provide a quantitative framework for engine calibration aimed at emission compliance without hardware modifications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cancino et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: