Do short design exercises boost confidence equally for males and females? In a 7-semester study (n=426; 201F, 225M), females reported lower initial confidence (p<.001, g=0.31) but matched males in final confidence and gains after four applied exercises (yield, creep, impact, fatigue). Regression showed no sex differences in final or Δ confidence (p=.42, g=0.03). Active design integration in engineering science courses may reduce sex-based disparities in engineering confidence and self-efficacy. Sex balance in the cohort may suppress typical gaps, highlighting context as key to equity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gordon Krauss (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: