Key result
GIP receptor antagonist reduces superior mesenteric artery blood flow increase by ~15% during oral glucose.
Why the study?
GIP receptor-related vascular biology is impaired or absent in type 2 diabetes, leaving the role of endogenous GIP on postprandial splanchnic blood flow unclear in this population.
Does intravenous GIP(3-30)NH2 reduce postprandial splanchnic blood flow in participants with type 2 diabetes?
RCT (n=10)
Single-blind
random.org
No
Does intravenous GIP(3-30)NH2 reduce postprandial splanchnic blood flow in participants with type 2 diabetes?
Effect estimate: 15% lower (95% CI -2, 32)
p-value: p=0.012
Endogenous GIP contributes to the postprandial increase in splanchnic blood flow in individuals with type 2 diabetes, as demonstrated by reduced blood flow when the GIP receptor is antagonized.
GIP vascular effects appear lost in type 2 diabetes; leaves open whether GIP receptor targeting alters splanchnic responses in this population.
Aims/hypothesis In healthy lean humans, endogenous glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) contributes significantly to the postprandial increase in arteria mesenterica superior blood flow. The vascular biology related to activation of the GIP receptor is markedly impaired in individuals with type 2 diabetes and is sometimes absent. In this population, we investigated the role of endogenous GIP on postprandial splanchnic blood flow by using the GIP receptor antagonist, GIP(3-30)NH 2 . The primary outcome of this study was the changes in blood flow in arteria mesenterica superior during oral glucose with or without GIP receptor antagonist infusion. Methods Ten participants with type 2 diabetes (age 20–80 years, BMI 20–35 kg/m 2 , and HbA 1c >48 mmol/mol and <75 mmol/mol) were investigated in a randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover study. On four separate occasions, participants received the following treatment: oral glucose + i.v. GIP(3-30)NH 2 ; oral glucose + i.v. saline (154 mmol/l NaCl); oral water + i.v. GIP(3-30)NH 2 ; oral water + i.v. saline. Participants were randomly assigned to intervention groups using (random.org). Participants were unaware of allocation, while investigators were aware. No additional allocation concealment procedures were used. During all four interventions, splanchnic blood flow was measured using phase-contrast MRI in the arteria mesenterica superior, truncus coeliacus and vena portae during oral glucose (75 g) or water ingestion. The study was conducted at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen. Liver volume and oxygenation, as well as gallbladder volume, were assessed. Blood samples were collected and analysed for insulin, C-peptide, GIP, glucagon and glucose. Results Oral glucose alone increased mean blood flow in arteria mesenterica superior by 57% (95% CI 26, 88) and this was 15% (95% CI −2, 32) lower during concomitant GIP receptor antagonist infusion, p =0.012. Infusion of GIP receptor antagonist during oral glucose treatment did also result in lower insulin secretion, C-peptide and C-peptide/glucose ratio compared with saline infusion, whereas glucagon levels and plasma glucose were unaffected. Oral water did not affect any outcomes. Conclusions/interpretation Endogenous GIP contributes to postprandially increased splanchnic blood flow in people with type 2 diabetes. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06426823 Funding This work was supported by the Novo Nordisk Foundation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rasmussen et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in type 2 diabetes (n=10). GIP(3-30)NH2 vs. i.v. saline was evaluated on changes in blood flow in arteria mesenterica superior during oral glucose with or without GIP receptor antagonist infusion (15% lower, 95% CI -2, 32, p=0.012). Infusion of the GIP receptor antagonist GIP(3-30)NH2 during oral glucose resulted in a 15% lower increase in arteria mesenterica superior blood flow compared to glucose alone (95% CI -2 to 32; p=0.012).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: