The J-HBR score demonstrated a discriminative ability similar to the ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT scores for predicting major bleeding events within 2 years, with an AUC of 0.86 compared to 0.83 and 0.80, respectively.
Observational (n=646)
No
Do the J-HBR, ARC-HBR, and PRECISE-DAPT scores differ in their discriminative ability for predicting short- and mid-term major bleeding events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.86% vs 0.83%
Background: This study aimed to compare the discriminative ability of the Japanese Version of High Bleeding Risk (J-HBR), Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR), and Predicting Bleeding Complications in Patients Undergoing Stent Implantation and Subsequent Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) scores for predicting major bleeding events.
Shimono et al. (Thu,) conducted a observational in Coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (n=646). J-HBR score vs. ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT scores was evaluated on Discriminative ability (AUC) for major bleeding events (BARC type 3 or 5) within 2 years. The J-HBR score demonstrated a discriminative ability similar to the ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT scores for predicting major bleeding events within 2 years, with an AUC of 0.86 compared to 0.83 and 0.80, respectively.