Randomized trial evaluates Newton's gravitational coupling in quantum traction theory, suggesting new interpretations.
A near-zero-pull Newton constant from non-gravitational source rails. Version: 7.03 Concept DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20057430 Author: Ali Attar Website: quantumtraction.org Main book anchor: Quantum Traction Theory: Main Book v10.01 The structural theorem is unchanged: \[ G_A=_A^2c^3/ = c^5/E_^2. \] This is not a claim that the SI value of \(G\) is produced from pure numbers alone. The paper's source-side claim is that once the Artian ruler \(_A\), tick, UEL action scale, angular capacity, and endurance endpoint are admitted, Newton's gravitational coupling is not an independent primitive. The most compact numerical landing in the current six-face ledger is the resolved photon-edge / Fermi scalar-lock face: \[ { G_A(γ H) =6.674301412455412×10⁻¹¹\ { SI}, {G_A(γ H)-GCODATA}{σ_G} =+0.009416σ. } \] Equivalently, the residual is only \[ { {G_A(γ H)-GCODATA}{GCODATA} =+0.211626\ { ppm}. } \] The Higgs/Fermi and resolved photon-edge scalar-lock rows coincide internally to \[ { |G_A^{(H→{ lab})}-G_A(γ H)| =2.326×10⁻²⁵\ { m^3\,kg⁻¹\,s⁻²}. } \] The six-face ledger still reads one endpoint through distinct sectors: \[ { {gathered} G_A^{({ end})} =_A^2c^3/ = c^5/E_^2,\\ m_0E_=(2π)^5v_Q^2 ⇒ G_A(ν) = c^5[m_0/(2π)^5v_Q^2]^2,\\ Ucap⁽¹⁾={αQTT}2E_ ⇒ G_A^{({ EM})} ={αQTT² c^5}{4(Ucap⁽¹⁾)^2},\\ vG_F=√2\, R_HEWq_HE_ ⇒ G_A^{(H→{ lab})} =2√2( R_HEWq_H)^2G_F { c^5}{(1\,{ GeV})^2},\\ m_tc^2=q_HR_tE_ ⇒ G_A⁽ᵗ⁾ = c^5(q_HR_t/m_tc^2)^2,\\ αQTT⁻¹ =4π(8+ρ/2+λ_γ) ⇒ G_A(γ H) =8√2\,G_F{ c^5}{(1\,{ GeV})^2} exp\![ -8π^2-1/4ρ^2 -{√{6+ρ⁻²}} {16πρ^2(8+ρ/2+λ_γ)} ]. {gathered} } \] The current external-branch audit is: \[ {array}{c|c|c} { row} & { residual} & { pull}\\ G_F{\ cluster} & +0.211626\ { ppm\ in}\ G & +0.009416σ\\ { top\ unit} & -24.150215\ { ppm\ in}\ G & -1.074572σ\\ ν{\ pre-JUNO} & +1.771521%\ { in}\ _A & +1.372392σ\\ ν{\ JUNO\ reactor} & +1.839436%\ { in}\ _A & +2.257765σ {array} \] Version 7.03 does not retune the neutrino source row: \[ { Δ m₂₁^{2,{ QTT}} =7.231516396661×10⁻⁵\ { eV}^2. } \] It refreshes the comparator ledger after the first JUNO reactor result. The dated pre-JUNO global-fit row remains printed: \[ Δ m₂₁^{2,{ pre-JUNO}} =7.49(19)×10⁻⁵\ { eV}^2, z_=+1.372392σ. \] The new JUNO reactor comparator is added: \[ Δ m₂₁^{2,{ JUNO\ reactor}} =7.50(12)×10⁻⁵\ { eV}^2, zΔ m^2=+2.237363σ, z_=+2.257765σ. \] The channel guardrail is now explicit: \[ { δJUNO (m_0QTT,ρ,Δ m₂₁^{2,{ QTT}})=0. } \] The first JUNO number is a reactor-channel comparator. The decisive stress test is the resolved JUNO solar/joint channel: a sub-percent joint value near \(7.50×10⁻⁵{ eV}^2\) would cross the printed kill condition, while a resolved movement toward the frozen QTT source row would collapse the reactor-channel strain. The Keystone rank statement remains: \[ { { rank}anchors=3+1: \{G_F{\ cluster}\},\ \{m_t\},\ \{Δ m₂₁^2\} +\{G_N{\ calibration}\}. } \] The six faces are not six statistically independent measurements of \(G\). They are six source-provenance readings of one endpoint with declared anchor structure. Main status labels: SIGMA-NEWTON-G-ENDURANCE-SOURCE-IDENTITY-CLOSED SIGMA-SIX-FACE-ARTIAN-G-MASTER-LEDGER-PRINTED SIGMA-KEYSTONE-CONDITIONALITY-LEDGER-PRINTED SIGMA-G-NU-EXT-PRE-JUNO-COMPARATOR-RETAINED SIGMA-G-NU-EXT-JUNO-REACTOR-COMPARATOR-PRINTED SIGMA-G-NU-EXT-JUNO-REACTOR-STRESSED-BELOW-TRIPWIRE SIGMA-SIX-FACE-CONSTRUCTOR-JACOBIAN-ZERO-CLOSED SIGMA-G-SIX-FACE-NO-RETUNE-FALSIFIER-ATLAS-PRINTED Related QTT anchors: Main book: 10.5281/zenodo.17527179 Artian Keystone Audit: 10.5281/zenodo.21141060 Artian A2 Endurance to Einstein-Field Dynamics: 10.5281/zenodo.20763263 QTT Photon-Edge Gate: 10.5281/zenodo.20628735 Newton's Second Law / inertia companion paper: 10.5281/zenodo.20059780 Corpus Tree family row: quantumtraction.org/doi-map/#concept-10-5281-zenodo-20057430 Derivation Atlas: quantumtraction.org/derivation-atlas/ Lexicon: quantumtraction.org/lexicon/ Two Universes source/readout page: quantumtraction.org/two-universes/ Included files: Main PDF paper, Version 7.03, uploaded first for Zenodo preview. Complete reconstruction ZIP containing the LaTeX source, load-bearing style file, numerical audit script, README, render audit, and SHA-256 manifest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ali Attar (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: