Assesses resilience management strategies for urban water supply, indicating potential for improved preparedness.
Investments in urban water supply should be informed by resilience management frameworks that consider traditional reliability requirements, community preparedness during system disruptions, and sustainability goals in long-term planning. Grounded in a framework (WARATA) that integrates these aspects, this paper presents a stepwise, performance-based theoretical approach to resilience quantification, supported by explanations and practical guidance. For instance, in addition to the piped infrastructure components, emergency supply options and human resources should be incorporated within the system boundaries (Step 1), and water supplied to users is recommended as a single performance measure (Step 2). During disruptions, performance at user nodes is influenced by operational rules for resource allocation (Step 3), which must be implemented in the required computer model for simulating performance (Step 4). Equations for computing withstanding, absorptive, restorative, adaptive, and transformative capabilities as time-based metrics are proposed (Step 5), enabling the analysis of results from the bottom up (Step 6) to inform resilience management. Using illustrations of performance curves at individual system nodes, this paper advocates for extended system boundaries that bridge the gap between infrastructure and community resilience; discusses challenges with the modeling of dynamic, adaptive performances; and emphasizes the importance of assessing temporal distances to fail-safe and safe-fail thresholds during disturbances. Pending case study validation and integration into tools for predictive and real-time analyses of options, the quantification approach could support infrastructure and emergency response planning and management, ultimately ensuring sustainable system designs with equitable resilience outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crozier et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: