Demonstrates improved throughput in underwater communication, indicating enhanced coding adaptations are beneficial.
Underwater acoustic (UWA) sensor and control links carry mostly short messages (below ∼10 kB) over time-varying, low-SNR multipath channels, which is a regime where forward error correction (FEC) operates on short, finite blocks where a single static configuration is inefficient. Adaptive schemes for these links typically adjust the modulation order and code rate; the payload segment (block) size—which, together with the code rate, sets the coded block length that governs the finite-blocklength penalty for short messages—is seldom adapted per transmission jointly with the choice of FEC scheme on a like-for-like footing. We propose a per-transmission controller that jointly selects the FEC scheme, code rate, and segment size from a prediction of the near-term channel state, which is paired with a like-for-like short-block benchmark of LDPC, list-decoded polar, BCH, Reed–Solomon, convolutional, and turbo codes. No single code dominates: under a unified ARQ goodput metric, the reliability–throughput frontier has a crossover that shifts with the channel, so the optimal FEC choice is channel-dependent. Across our experiments, the segment-size degree of freedom is the dominant throughput lever, capturing essentially all of the adaptation gain at low-to-mid SNR and over fading; switching the FEC family adds a further, bounded gain only where the frontier crosses between families (up to 10% at high-SNR AWGN, polar to RS). The joint controller essentially matches a fair single-family adaptive baseline off the crossover (to within a negligible prediction-overhead margin) and exceeds it at that crossover, beats a fixed, no-CSI code by up to 16%, and captures 91–99% of an oracle; a lightweight persistence predictor matches a learned LSTM for the first-order channel-state model studied. A statistics-driven replay using measured-channel parameters, and a recorded-channel replay over the public Watermark benchmark, preserve the same family ordering.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: