Reliable UAV radio links operating under intentional interference require adaptation mechanisms that account not only for channel quality but also for the internal dynamics of iterative decoding. This paper proposes a convergence-aware cross-layer control method for LDPC-coded UAV radio links in which decoder-convergence information is incorporated into the state used for finite-set robust configuration selection. The proposed contribution is not a new LDPC decoding or early-stopping algorithm. Instead, effective SINR and jammer-state estimates are combined with LLR variation, parity-check information, decoding latency, and energy indicators to select the modulation order, coding rate, maximum LDPC iteration limit, and convergence threshold. The control problem is formulated over a finite configuration catalogue using robust feasibility filtering, worst-case Pareto pruning, and minimax selection subject to BLER, latency, normalized energy, and minimum-goodput constraints. Performance is evaluated for IEEE 802.11n QC-LDPC codes with a codeword length of 1296 bits under AWGN and Rayleigh fading with stochastic on–off Gaussian jamming. Practical syndrome/CRC termination is used in the baseline receivers, and the contribution of decoder-convergence information is isolated through an ablation with an otherwise identical Pareto–minimax controller. Under resource-matched transmit-power and MCS conditions, convergence-aware control reduces the mean decoding iteration count by 7.72%, modeled decoding latency by 6.56%, and normalized energy per successfully delivered information bit by 4.39%. The corresponding BLER change is 0.0257% points and the goodput change is approximately 0.03%. These results indicate that decoder-convergence information primarily improves decoding-resource allocation rather than providing a large additional reliability gain. The conclusions are limited to the evaluated channel, coding, and jammer models; hardware implementation and robustness to unmodelled interference remain subjects for further study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Serhii Liventsev (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: