Study benchmarks pressure injury staging in photographs, indicating potential for clinical support.
Objective: To benchmark zero-shot generative pre-trained transformer (GPT)-based multimodal large language models (MLLMs) for pressure injury (PI) staging from photographs and quantify the effects of prompt strategy, structured outputs, and clinically meaningful label granularity. Approach: We performed a retrospective observational benchmark using 1,091 public, de-identified PI photographs labeled Stage I–IV. In the standardized analysis, all 10 model/prompt conditions were evaluated using a standardized, resume-safe application programming interface pipeline with per-image logging. We evaluated exact four-class staging, three-class staging (I/II/III–IV), skin-break screening (I vs. II–IV), and an advanced-intervention threshold (I–II vs. III–IV). Reporting followed Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology and artificial intelligence/machine learning guidance; metrics included accuracy, Wilson 95% confidence intervals, F1 scores, weighted kappa, and threshold sensitivity/specificity. Results: All conditions yielded parsed predictions for all 1,091 images. The best accuracy was 93.77% for skin-break screening (GPT-5.2 structured JavaScript Object Notation [JSON]), 90.28% for the advanced-intervention threshold (GPT-5.1 full prompt, low reasoning), 83.78% for three-class staging (GPT-5.1 full prompt, low reasoning), and 65.08% for exact four-class staging (GPT-5.2 structured JSON). The best advanced-intervention condition achieved sensitivity 96.72%, specificity 83.79%, and negative predictive value 96.19%. Stage IV undercalling remained safety-relevant; GPT-5.2-pro had Stage IV recall 8.79% and false-negative rate 91.21%. Innovation: This prompt-transparent benchmark shows how outcome granularity, prompting, and structured outputs affect GPT-based PI staging and adds ordinal, threshold-based, and safety metrics. Conclusion: GPT-based MLLMs may support clinician-supervised triage and prioritization, but image-only autonomous exact staging is not clinically ready. Toshiaki Takahashi, RN, PhD
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takahashi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: