Key result
Platelet aggregation assays and quantitative analysis of platelet dense granule numbers demonstrated good performance characteristics for detecting bleeding abnormalities in patients with PFD.
Why the study?
Platelet function disorders require validated and practical laboratory strategies for diagnosis.
What are the practical and useful diagnostic testing strategies for platelet function disorders?
What are the practical and useful diagnostic testing strategies for platelet function disorders?
Platelet aggregation assays and dense granule quantification are reliable diagnostic tests for platelet function disorders, though resource constraints and evidence gaps limit broader test menu offerings.
Supports aggregation and dense granule testing in suspected PFD; leaves open broader adoption amid resource constraints and evidence gaps.
INTRODUCTION: Platelet function disorders (PFD) are an important group of bleeding disorders that require validated and practical laboratory strategies for diagnosis. METHODS: This review summarizes the authors' experiences, current literature, and an international survey to evaluate the practices of diagnostic laboratories that offer tests for PFD. RESULTS: Blood counts, blood film review, and aggregation tests are the most commonly performed investigations for PFD and help determine whether there is thrombocytopenia and/or defective platelet function due to a variety of causes. The performance characteristics of tests for PFD, and the level of evidence that these tests detect bleeding problems, are important issues to determine where tests are useful for diagnostic or correlative purposes, or research only uses. Platelet aggregation assays, and quantitative analysis of platelet dense granule numbers, are tests with good performance characteristics that detect abnormalities associated with increased bleeding in a significant proportion of individuals referred for PFD investigations. Lumiaggregometry estimates of platelet adenosine triphosphate release show greater variability which limits the diagnostic usefulness. Diagnostic laboratories report that fiscal and other constraints, including a lack of high-quality evidence, limit their ability to offer an expanded test menu for PFD. CONCLUSION: PFD are clinically important bleeding disorders that remain challenging for diagnostic laboratories to investigate. While some PFD tests are well validated for diagnostic purposes, gaps in scientific evidence and resource limitations influence diagnostic laboratory decisions on which PFD tests to offer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hayward et al. (2019) conducted a review in Platelet function disorders. Diagnostic testing for platelet function disorders was evaluated. Platelet aggregation assays and quantitative analysis of platelet dense granule numbers demonstrated good performance characteristics for detecting bleeding abnormalities in patients with PFD.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: