Evaluates tCMA and tCMV for predicting cardiac events in sarcoidosis, indicating better stratification than SUVmax.
Background FDG-PET/CT SUVmax reflects focal metabolic intensity but not the patchy inflammatory burden of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). We evaluated whether volume-based total cardiac metabolic volume (tCMV) and total cardiac metabolic activity (tCMA), measured after optimized suppression, predict long-term major adverse cardiac events (MACE) better than SUVmax. Methods Forty-eight consecutive patients with CS classified by JCS 2016 criteria underwent FDG-PET/CT after 24-h strict carbohydrate restriction without high-fat supplementation and delayed cardiac imaging at 120 min. tCMV, tCMA, and SUVmax were quantified at a fixed SUV threshold of 1.70. MACE was assessed over a median of 7.3 years. DeLong tests and Firth-penalized Cox regression evaluated prognostic performance. Results MACE occurred in 18 of 48 patients (37.5%). tCMA (AUC, 0.766) and tCMV (AUC, 0.764) outperformed SUVmax (AUC, 0.606; DeLong P = 0.008 and 0.013). High tCMA predicted higher MACE rates (log-rank P = 0.0003). In multivariate Firth-penalized Cox regression, tCMA (HR per unit, 1.0010 [95% CI, 1.0005–1.0016]; HR per IQR, 1.4093 [1.1671–1.7019]; P = 0.0002) and NYHA class (HR, 2.7460 [1.6209–4.6521]; P = 0.0002) were independently associated with MACE. Adding tCMA to NYHA class and troponin T provided modest incremental discrimination (ΔC-index, 0.081; 95% CI, 0.001–0.206). Conclusions Under optimized suppression, tCMA captured global inflammatory burden rather than focal intensity and improved MACE risk stratification in CS. Volume-based quantification may complement SUVmax and conventional risk markers, pending external validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fukushima et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: