Key result
The high sensitivity troponin I assay yielded a critical outlier rate of 0%, compared to 0.37% and 0.51% for the contemporary assay, reducing the risk of patient misclassification.
Why the study?
Does the high sensitivity TnI assay reduce critical outliers compared to the contemporary TnI assay in routine patient samples?
Observational (n=15,622)
Does the high sensitivity TnI assay reduce critical outliers compared to the contemporary TnI assay in routine patient samples?
The high sensitivity TnI assay eliminates critical outliers seen with the contemporary assay, reducing the risk of patient misclassification, though total outlier rates remain higher than expected variability.
May favor hs-TnI assays to reduce critical outliers in diagnostics; leaves open prospective outcome validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: False-positive cardiac troponin (Tn) results caused by outliers have been reported on various analytical platforms. We have compared the precision profile and outlier rate of the Abbott Diagnostics contemporary troponin I (TnI) assay with their high sensitivity (hs) TnI assay. METHODS: Three studies were conducted over a 10-month period using routine patients' samples. TnI was measured in duplicate using the contemporary TnI assay in Study 1 and Study 2 (n = 7011 and 7089) and the hs-TnI assay in Study 3 (n = 1522). Critical outliers were defined as duplicate results whose absolute difference exceeded a critical difference (CD = z x √2 x SDAnalytical) at a probability level of 0.0005, with one of the results on the opposite side of the decision limit to its partner. RESULTS: The TnI concentration at 10% imprecision (coefficient of variation) for the contemporary TnI assay was 0.034 µg/L (Study 1) and 0.042 µg/L (Study 2), and 0.006 µg/L (6 ng/L) for the hs-TnI assay. The critical outlier rates for the contemporary TnI assay were 0.51% (Study 1) and 0.37% (Study 2) using a cut-off of 0.04 µg/L, and 0% for the hs-TnI assay using gender-specific cut-offs. CONCLUSION: The significant number of critical outliers detected using the contemporary TnI assay may pose a risk for misclassification of patients. By contrast, no critical outliers were detected using the hs-TnI assay. However, the total outlier rates for both assays were significantly higher than the expected variability of either assay. The cause of these outliers remains unclear.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sawyer et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Routine patients' samples (n=15,622). High sensitivity (hs) TnI assay vs. Contemporary TnI assay was evaluated on Critical outlier rate. The high sensitivity troponin I assay yielded a critical outlier rate of 0%, compared to 0.37% and 0.51% for the contemporary assay, reducing the risk of patient misclassification.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: