Key result
Salivary biomarkers were significantly elevated in heart failure patients compared to healthy controls across 15 studies, except for amylase, sodium, and chloride which were lower.
Why the study?
The potential value of saliva biomarkers in the diagnosis, management, and prognosis of HF, and their correlation with plasma values, required systematic evaluation.
Do salivary biomarkers have diagnostic and prognostic value compared to plasma biomarkers in patients with heart failure?
Systematic Review
Do salivary biomarkers have diagnostic and prognostic value compared to plasma biomarkers in patients with heart failure?
Salivary biomarkers show potential for diagnosing and monitoring heart failure, though larger studies are needed to validate their clinical utility.
Saliva biomarkers may aid non-invasive HF assessment; leaves open standardization and clinical validation in prospective studies.
The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review on the potential value of saliva biomarkers in the diagnosis, management and prognosis of heart failure (HF). The correlation between saliva and plasma values of these biomarkers was also studied. PubMed was searched to collect relevant literature, i.e., case-control, cross-sectional studies that either compared the values of salivary biomarkers among healthy subjects and HF patients, or investigated their role in risk stratification and prognosis in HF patients. No randomized control trials were included. The search ended on 31st of December 2020. A total of 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. 18 salivary biomarkers were analyzed and the levels of all biomarkers studied were found to be higher in HF patients compared to controls, except for amylase, sodium, and chloride that had smaller saliva concentrations in HF patients. Natriuretic peptides are the most commonly used plasma biomarkers in the management of HF. Their saliva levels show promising results, although the correlation of saliva to plasma values is weakened in higher plasma values. In most of the publications, differences in biomarker levels between HF patients and controls were found to be statistically significant. Due to the small number of patients included, larger studies need to be conducted in order to facilitate the use of saliva biomarkers in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rammos et al. (2021) conducted a systematic review in Heart failure. Salivary biomarkers vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Salivary biomarker levels. Salivary biomarkers were significantly elevated in heart failure patients compared to healthy controls across 15 studies, except for amylase, sodium, and chloride which were lower.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: