Key result
Bicuspid aortic valve patients with root phenotype (aortic root dilation and aortic insufficiency) have a higher risk of catastrophic aortic complications and should be treated more aggressively.
Patients with bicuspid aortic valve presenting with the root phenotype (aortic root dilation and aortic insufficiency) may warrant more aggressive surgical management due to an elevated risk of catastrophic aortic complications.
Supports phenotype-specific risk assessment in bicuspid aortic valve; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) can be both sporadic and hereditary, is phenotypically variable, and genetically heterogeneous. The clinical presentation of BAV is diverse and commonly associated with a high prevalence of valvular dysfunction producing altered hemodynamics and aortic abnormalities (e.g., aneurysm and dissection). The thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) in BAV frequently involves the proximal aorta, including the aortic root, ascending aorta, and aortic arch, but spares the aorta distal to the aortic arch. While the ascending aortic aneurysm might be affected by both aortopathy and hemodynamics, the aortic root aneurysm is considered to be more of a consequence of aortopathy rather than hemodynamics, especially in younger patients. The management of aortic aneurysm in BAV has been very controversial because the molecular mechanism is unknown. Increasing evidence points toward the BAV root phenotype [aortic root dilation with aortic insufficiency (AI)] as having a higher risk of catastrophic aortic complications. We propose more aggressive surgical approaches toward the BAV with root phenotype.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Norton et al. (2017) conducted a review in Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm in Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valve. Phenotype-based surgical management vs. Uniform blanket approach was evaluated. Bicuspid aortic valve patients with root phenotype (aortic root dilation and aortic insufficiency) have a higher risk of catastrophic aortic complications and should be treated more aggressively.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: