Key result
A prophylactic 14-day postoperative course of diltiazem did not significantly reduce the prevalence of new-onset atrial fibrillation compared to standard care (8.8% vs 10.8%, p=0.744).
Why the study?
Atrial fibrillation is the most frequent arrhythmic disorder after thoracoabdominal esophageal resection and significantly increases perioperative morbidity and mortality.
Does diltiazem prophylaxis prevent postoperative new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing thoracoabdominal esophagectomy?
Cohort (n=117)
No
Does diltiazem prophylaxis prevent postoperative new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing thoracoabdominal esophagectomy?
Prophylactic diltiazem after thoracoabdominal esophagectomy does not reduce new-onset atrial fibrillation but increases the risk of bradycardia and need for vasopressors.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Diltiazem shows no AF benefit and possible harm after esophagectomy; should not change practice pending RCTs.
Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) represents the most frequent arrhythmic disorder after thoracoabdominal esophageal resection and is associated with a significant increase in perioperative morbidity and mortality. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, 167 patients who underwent thoracoabdominal esophagectomy at a large university hospital were assessed. We compared patients who received a 14‐day postoperative course of diltiazem with a control group of patients who did not undergo diltiazem prophylaxis. Diltiazem therapy started immediately upon admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a loading dose of 0.25 mg/kg bodyweight (i.v.) followed by continuous infusion (0.1 mg/kg bodyweight/h) for 40–48 h. Oral administration (Dilzem ® 180 mg uno retard, once a day) was started on postoperative day 3. Results A total of 117 patients were assessed. Twelve (10.3%) of all patients developed postoperative new‐onset atrial fibrillation in the first 30 days after surgical intervention. Prevalence of new‐onset AF showed no significant differences between the diltiazem group and control group ( p = 0.74). The prevalence of bradycardia (14.7% vs. 3.6%; p = 0.03) and dose of norepinephrine required (0.09 vs. 0.04 µg/kg bodyweight/min; p = 0.04) were higher in the diltiazem group. There were no significant differences between the groups for the median postoperative duration of hospital/ICU stay or mortality. Conclusions A prophylactic 14‐day postoperative course of diltiazem was not associated with a reduction in new‐onset AF or 30‐day mortality following thoracoabdominal esophagectomy. Prophylactic diltiazem therapy was associated with drug‐related adverse effects such as bradycardia and increased requirement of norepinephrine. German Clinical Trial Registration Number: DKRS00016631.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hochreiter et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Thoracoabdominal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer (n=117). Diltiazem prophylaxis vs. Standard care (no diltiazem prophylaxis) was evaluated on New-onset atrial fibrillation within 30 days after surgery (Difference -2.0%, 95% CI -13.1 to 13.8, p=0.744). A prophylactic 14-day postoperative course of diltiazem did not significantly reduce the prevalence of new-onset atrial fibrillation compared to standard care (8.8% vs 10.8%, p=0.744).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: