Why the study?
Does prophylactic amiodarone or diltiazem prevent postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing coronary bypass grafting compared to standard oral beta blockers?
Does prophylactic amiodarone or diltiazem prevent postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing coronary bypass grafting compared to standard oral beta blockers?
Prophylactic diltiazem and amiodarone are safe and may marginally reduce postoperative atrial fibrillation compared to standard beta-blocker therapy in patients undergoing coronary bypass grafting.
Diltiazem may reduce postoperative AF after CABG versus beta-blockers; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
The prophylactic effect of amiodarone on atrial fibrillation after coronary bypass grafting with extracorporeal circulation was compared with that of diltiazem in two groups of 60 patients each. Patients were monitored continuously for 8 days. The incidence of atrial fibrillation was recorded retrospectively in a control group of 60 patients who received our standard prophylactic regimen of an oral beta blocker. The incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation was not significantly different in the two test groups: 11.7% for the amiodarone group and 10% for the diltiazem group. The incidence of atrial fibrillation in the control group was 23.3% and the differences were marginally significant when compared to the amiodarone ( p = 0.093) and diltiazem groups ( p = 0.050). The prophylactic use of diltiazem or amiodarone is feasible and safe for patients undergoing coronary bypass, with similar rates of atrial fibrillation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mikroulis et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: