Key result
Diastolic dyssynchrony parameters predict favorable fusion CRT response with ~0.90 AUC.
Why the study?
CRT improves systolic and diastolic function, but the role of LV diastolic dyssynchrony in predicting outcomes with fusion pacing CRT needed assessment.
Does LV diastolic dyssynchrony predict favorable response to fusion pacing CRT in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy?
Cohort (n=62)
Does LV diastolic dyssynchrony predict favorable response to fusion pacing CRT in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy?
Diastolic dyssynchrony parameters (E″T and A″T) can reliably predict echocardiographic and clinical response to fusion CRT pacing in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support diastolic dyssynchrony assessment for fusion CRT selection; leaves open prospective validation in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Background: CRT improves systolic and diastolic function, increasing cardiac output. Aim of the study: to assess the outcome of LV diastolic dyssynchrony in a population of fusion pacing CRT. Methods: Diastolic dyssynchrony was measured by offline speckle-tracking-derived TDI timing assessment of the simultaneity of E″ and A″ basal septal and lateral walls. New parameters introduced: E″ and, respectively, A″ time (E″T/A″T) as the time difference between E″ (respectively, A″) peak septal and lateral wall. Patients were divided into super-responders (SR), responders (R), and non-responders (NR). Results: Baseline characteristics: 62 pts (62 ± 11 y.o.) with idiopathic DCM, EF 27 ± 5.2%; 29% type III diastolic dysfunction (DD), 63% type II, 8% type I. Average follow-up 45 ± 19 months: LVEF 37 ± 7.9%, 34%SR, 61%R, 5%NR. The E″T decreased from 90 ± 20 ms to 25 ± 10 ms in SR with significant LV reverse remodeling (LV end-diastolic volume 193.7 ± 81 vs. 243.2 ± 82 mL at baseline, p < 0.0028) and lower LV filling pressures (E/E′ 13.2 ± 4.6 vs. 11.4 ± 4.5, p = 0.0295). DD profile improved in 65% of R with a reduction in E/E′ ratio (21 ± 9 vs. 14 ± 4 ms, p < 0.0001). Significant cut-off value calculated by ROC curve for LV diastolic dyssynchrony is E″T > 80 ms and A″T > 30 msec. Conclusions: The study identifies the cut-off values of diastolic dyssynchrony parameters as predictors of favorable outcomes in responders and super-responder patients with fusion CRT pacing. These findings may have important implications in patient selection and follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gurgu et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy with heart failure (NYHA III-IV, LBBB, QRS >130ms) (n=62). Fusion pacing cardiac resynchronization therapy (RA/LV pacing without RV lead) was evaluated on Predictive value of diastolic dyssynchrony parameter E″T > 80 ms for CRT response (AUC 0.8989, 95% CI 0.8401-0.9577, p=<0.0001). New diastolic dyssynchrony parameters E″T > 80 ms and A″T > 30 ms were identified as strong predictors of favorable outcomes in patients receiving fusion CRT pacing.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: