Key result
LV-only fusion pacing CRT responders exhibit a ~3-fold higher heart rate recovery index than non-responders.
Why the study?
The study aimed to identify new predictors of response to left-ventricular-only fusion pacing cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Cohort (n=62)
Absolute Event Rate: 2.87% vs 0.98%
p-value: p=0.03
Heart rate recovery index and deceleration time during exercise testing, along with diastolic dyssynchrony parameters, can help predict responsiveness to LV-only fusion pacing CRT in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.
HRRI may identify LV-only fusion pacing CRT responders; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Background: Restoring electrical synchrony with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reverses the heart failure phenotype developed by left-ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony. This study aimed to identify new predictors of response to LV-only fusion pacing CRT. Methods: A select group of patients with CRT-P indications received a right atrium (RA)/LV DDD pacing system. LV dyssynchrony was assessed via offline TDI timing focusing on the temporal difference between peak septal (E″T) and lateral wall (A“T) motion. CRT effectiveness was evaluated at each follow-up, involving the heart rate recovery index (HRRI) parameter (acceleration/deceleration time) derived from exercise testing along with the echocardiographic parameters. Patients were classified into super-responders (SR), responders (R), and non-responders (NR). Results: Baseline initial characteristics: 62 patients (35 male) aged 62 ± 11 y.o. with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Ejection fraction (EF) 27 ± 5.2%; QRS 164 ± 18 ms; 29% had type III diastolic dysfunction (DD), 63% type II DD, and 8% type I DD. Average follow-up was 45 ± 19 months: 34% of patients were SR, 61% R, and 5% NR. The E″T decreased from 90 ± 20 ms to 25 ± 10 ms in SR, with a shorter deceleration time (DT) during exercise test compared to NR (109 ± 68 ms vs. 330 ± 30 ms; p < 0.0001). The responders present a higher HRRI (2.87 ± 1.47 vs. 0.98 ± 0.08; p = 0.03) compared to NR and a significantly decrease in E“T and A“T from 76 ± 13 ms to 51 ± 11 ms (p < 0.0001). Prolonged DT was associated with an accentuated LV dyssynchrony and nonoptimal response to CRT. Conclusions: The study identified new parameters for assessing responsiveness to LV-only fusion pacing CRT, which could improve candidate selection and CRT implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gurgu et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy with CRT-P indications (n=62). LV-only fusion pacing CRT (RA/LV DDD pacing system) vs. Non-responders (internal comparison) was evaluated on Heart rate recovery index (HRRI) (p=0.03). LV-only fusion pacing CRT responders demonstrated a significantly higher heart rate recovery index compared to non-responders (2.87 vs. 0.98; p=0.03), identifying a new predictor of CRT response.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: