Systematic review finds mazdutide reduces body weight and HbA1c in adults with obesity and T2D, suggesting metabolic benefits.
Aim To assess the effects of mazdutide on body weight, HbA1c, metabolic outcomes, and adverse events in adults with overweight/obesity and/or type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods This systematic review and meta‐analysis included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing mazdutide with placebo or active comparators in adults with overweight/obesity and/or T2D, identified through PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov to 20 February 2026. Co‐primary outcomes were percent change in body weight and change in HbA1c. Secondary outcomes included other weight‐related and metabolic outcomes, as well as safety. Random‐effects models were used to generate pooled mean differences (MDs) or risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals, and the certainty of the evidence (COE) was assessed using GRADE. Results Nine RCTs ( N = 2292; most with low risk of bias) were included. In overweight/obesity without diabetes, mazdutide 3, 4, and 6 mg reduced body weight more than placebo (MDs −6.56%, −9.92%, and −11.1%, respectively; very low COE due to substantial heterogeneity and few trials). In T2D, mazdutide 4 and 6 mg reduced body weight and HbA1c versus placebo (moderate COE) and also outperformed dulaglutide for both outcomes. Mazdutide also improved waist circumference, lipids, liver enzymes, and uric acid levels. Gastrointestinal adverse events were more frequent, but serious adverse events and treatment discontinuation rates were comparable with those of the comparators. Conclusions Mazdutide was associated with dose‐dependent reductions in body weight and HbA1c, with broader metabolic benefits in predominantly Chinese adults with obesity and/or T2D. Longer‐term, multi‐ethnic studies are needed to confirm durability, generalizability, and cardiovascular safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kamrul-Hasan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: