Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreJournal ClubResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
July 8, 2026Open Access

Evolution of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in the Era of New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents: Balancing Ischemic and Bleeding Risks

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Prolonged DAPT after PCI increases major bleeding risk and mortality, prompting the need to summarize evidence on evolving DAPT regimens with new-generation DES and propose a practical algorithm to personalize therapy based on bleeding and ischemic risks.

Does short-duration DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy balance ischemic and bleeding risks in patients undergoing PCI with new-generation DES compared to prolonged DAPT?

Design

Narrative review of the literature (2015–2026)

Key result

Shortening dual antiplatelet therapy to 1 to 3 months followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy is a validated strategy for patients with new-generation drug-eluting stents at high bleeding risk.

Authors

AMAdilmyrza MukhamedkaliAZAssel Zholdysbayeva

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Shorter DAPT post-DES reduces bleeding without excess thrombosis; confirms consensus on individualized regimens after PCI.

Key Points

  • The aim is to summarize the evolution of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) regimens with new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) and propose personalized approaches.
  • Narrative review of literature from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (2015–2026)
  • Prioritized guideline documents from ESC and ACC/AHA and large randomized controlled trials such as TWILIGHT and MASTER DAPT
  • Utilized ischemic and bleeding risk scoring systems for therapy personalization.
  • First-generation DES required prolonged DAPT (≥12 months) due to delayed endothelialization and late stent thrombosis.
  • New-generation DES improved vascular healing, allowing for short-DAPT strategies (1 to 3 months) followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy in high bleeding risk patients.
  • Risk scoring systems like PRECISE-DAPT and ARC-HBR criteria are essential for determining appropriate therapy duration.

Structured PICO

Does short-duration DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy balance ischemic and bleeding risks in patients undergoing PCI with new-generation DES compared to prolonged DAPT?

P
Population
Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) or stable ischemic heart disease, particularly those at high bleeding risk (HBR).
I
Intervention
Short-duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (1 to 3 months) followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy.
C
Comparator
Prolonged DAPT (≥12 months).
O
Outcome
Ischemic protection (prevention of stent thrombosis) and bleeding risk (major bleeding).

The paradigm of DAPT duration has shifted to personalized medicine, where short DAPT strategies are safe and effective for patients with new-generation DES, especially those at high bleeding risk.

Cite This Study

Mukhamedkali et al. (2026) conducted a review in Acute coronary syndromes and stable ischemic heart disease. Short-duration dual antiplatelet therapy (1 to 3 months) vs. Prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (≥12 months) was evaluated. Shortening dual antiplatelet therapy to 1 to 3 months followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy is a validated strategy for patients with new-generation drug-eluting stents at high bleeding risk.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a4de835d2ea289ef628300fhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21223014
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share