Evaluates the effects of peanut shell powder and waste cooking oil on asphalt's rheological properties, suggesting an effective modification strategy.
Waste biomass powders and waste oils are promising sustainable modifiers for asphalt binders, but solid-phase biomass powders and oil-phase modifiers often have competing effects on high-temperature stability and low-temperature relaxation. In this study, peanut shell powder (PSP) and waste cooking oil (WCO) were combined at a fixed mass ratio of 1:1 to modify No. 70 base asphalt binder, and the material characteristics, physical properties, rheological responses, and chemical interactions of unaged PSP/WCO-modified asphalt binders with total modifier dosages of 5%, 10%, and 15% were evaluated. The results showed that PSP had a rough, wrinkled, and locally porous lignocellulosic structure and showed no obvious thermal decomposition near the preparation temperature of approximately 150 °C. As the PSP/WCO dosage increased from 0% to 15%, the softening point increased from 50.2 °C to 53.9 °C, while penetration decreased from 66.2 to 62.6 (0.1 mm) and ductility decreased from 74.0 mm to 69.5 mm, indicating increased binder consistency and improved high-temperature flow resistance. DSR and MSCR results showed enhanced high-temperature deformation resistance; at 15% dosage, Jnr at 3.2 kPa decreased from 2.35 to 1.25 kPa−1, while R increased from 0.51% to 1.36%. However, BBR results showed increased creep stiffness and decreased m-value, indicating reduced low-temperature relaxation capacity. FTIR spectra showed no new strong characteristic absorption peaks, suggesting that the modification was mainly associated with physical blending, compositional regulation, and weak intermolecular interactions. The main novelty of this work is that it demonstrates a fixed-ratio PSP/WCO composite modification strategy that combines biomass-powder reinforcement with oil-phase regulation to improve the unaged high-temperature rheological performance of asphalt binders while promoting the resource utilization of peanut shells and waste cooking oil.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: