Randomized trial demonstrates improved balance control in a self-balancing wheelchair, highlighting engineering applicability.
A two-wheeled self-balancing wheelchair is a highly nonlinear and underactuated wheeled inverted-pendulum system, which faces severe balance control challenges under large tilt angles, load variations, and external disturbances. A hybrid nonlinear model predictive control–linear quadratic regulator (NMPC–LQR) balance control scheme is presented that combines nonlinear optimal recovery and efficient local stabilization while reducing the computational burden. A reduced-order nonlinear dynamic model of the wheelchair–occupant system is derived via the Lagrange method. The proposed controller confines LQR to a locally valid region verified by linearization-error analysis, whereas NMPC is employed for large-deviation recovery. A linearization-error analysis is first used to determine the switching-threshold search range, and a normalized five-index criterion identifies 0.100 rad as the optimal nominal threshold. Mass-sensitivity tests further provide an empirical relation for estimating the optimal threshold within the tested mass range. Comparative simulations under initial tilt angles of 35, 40, and 45° show faster convergence than standalone LQR and standalone NMPC controllers. Benchmark comparisons with SMC demonstrate a larger recoverable initial-angle range. Robustness tests under parameter variations, pulse and step disturbances, and flat-ground friction changes, together with prototype experiments, validate the stability, disturbance rejection, and engineering applicability of the proposed control strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: