Randomized trial compares microtensile bond strength and adhesive thickness in extracted molars, indicating potential durability benefits of a new adhesive.
PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate and compare the immediate and aged microtensile bond strengths (μTBS) and pre-aging adhesive layer thicknesses of G2-Bond Universal, a novel two-bottle universal adhesive, with those of the gold-standard twostep self-etch adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond) and one-step universal adhesive (G-Premio Bond).Materials and MethodsThirty extracted human molars were randomly assigned to three adhesive systems (n=10 teeth per group). After standardized dentin surface preparation, adhesives were applied according to manufacturers’ protocols, followed by incremental composite build-up. Specimens were sectioned to obtain rectangular prism-shaped sticks (1 mm2 cross-sectional area), which were allocated to immediate and 6- month water aging subgroups (n=90each). μTBS was measured using a universal testing machine. Adhesive layer thickness was assessed on 90 pre-aging sticks via scanning electron microscopy, with measurements performed using ImageJ software. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA for μTBS and one-way ANOVA for adhesive thickness, followed by Tukey’s HSD.ResultsAging showed no statistically significant effect on μTBS (p>0.05). Clearfil SE Bond exhibited the highest μTBS values, significantly outperforming G-Premio Bond (p<0.05), while no statistically significant difference was observed compared with G2-Bond Universal (p>0.05). G2-Bond demonstrated the thickest adhesive layer.ConclusionThe thicker adhesive layer of G2-Bond may enhance its mechanical resilience and clinical durability under functional stresses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tonga et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: