Outcomes and Decision-Making Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Within a Multidisciplinary Neuroprognostication Pathway in a Tertiary Cardiac Intensive Care Unit

Background/Objectives: Neuroprognostication after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains clinically challenging, particularly when withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (WLST) is considered. International guidelines recommend delayed, multimodal assessment, but real-world descriptions of how this is operationalised within multidisciplinary pathways remain limited. Methods: We conducted a single-centre retrospective observational cohort study of adults admitted to a tertiary cardiac arrest centre intensive care unit following OHCA between June 2022 and December 2025. Patients were conveyed according to the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society OHCA pathway; therefore, this was a selected cardiac arrest centre cohort enriched for shockable rhythms and suspected reversible cardiac causes, rather than an unselected OHCA population. Patients who remained unconscious at ≥72 h following a sedation hold entered a structured multidisciplinary team (MDT) neuroprognostication pathway. Outcomes included survival to hospital discharge, Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) at discharge, neuroprognostication investigation use, and timing of WLST. Results: Of 406 patients admitted following OHCA, 310 were admitted to ICU and included in the analysis. The cohort was predominantly male (82.3%), with a mean age of 63.8 years; 82.9% had ventricular fibrillation as the initial rhythm. Overall, 182 patients (58.7%) survived to hospital discharge, of whom 160 (87.9%) had a favourable neurological outcome (CPC 1–2). A total of 119 patients entered the neuroprognostication pathway. Of these, 72 underwent WLST after completed MDT review, 10 died before MDT decision-making, and 37 survived to hospital discharge. Among patients undergoing WLST, investigation use was high: CT brain 100%, NSE 91.7%, EEG 90.3%, SSEP 88.9%, and MRI brain 27.8%. Median time to WLST was 5.5 days. Conclusions: In this selected tertiary CAC cohort, enriched for shockable rhythms through BCIS pathway-based conveyance, survival to hospital discharge was high and neurological outcomes among survivors were predominantly favourable. Within this setting, delayed, multimodal neuroprognostication and WLST decision-making were operationalised through a structured MDT pathway aligned with contemporary guideline recommendations. These findings provide contemporary real-world benchmark data on pathway implementation for comparable centres seeking to evaluate or develop structured neuroprognostication services.