In ACS patients with chronic kidney disease, ticagrelor reduced cardiovascular death, MI, and stroke compared with clopidogrel (17.3% vs 22.0%; HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.65-0.90).
RCT (n=15,202)
Yes
Does ticagrelor reduce the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke compared to clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes and chronic kidney disease?
Ticagrelor provides a significant reduction in ischemic endpoints and mortality compared to clopidogrel in ACS patients with chronic kidney disease, without a significant increase in major bleeding.
Hazard Ratio: 0.77 (95% CI 0.65–0.9)
Absolute Event Rate: 17.3% vs 22%
BACKGROUND: Reduced renal function is associated with a poorer prognosis and increased bleeding risk in patients with acute coronary syndromes and may therefore alter the risk-benefit ratio with antiplatelet therapies. In the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial, ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel reduced the primary composite end point of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke at 12 months but with similar major bleeding rates. METHODS AND RESULTS: Central laboratory serum creatinine levels were available in 15 202 (81.9%) acute coronary syndrome patients at baseline, and creatinine clearance, estimated by the Cockcroft Gault equation, was calculated. In patients with chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance <60 mL/min; n=3237), ticagrelor versus clopidogrel significantly reduced the primary end point to 17.3% from 22.0% (hazard ratio HR, 0.77; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.65 to 0.90) with an absolute risk reduction greater than that of patients with normal renal function (n=11 965): 7.9% versus 8.9% (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.02). In patients with chronic kidney disease, ticagrelor reduced total mortality (10.0% versus 14.0%; HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.89). Major bleeding rates, fatal bleedings, and non-coronary bypass-related major bleedings were not significantly different between the 2 randomized groups (15.1% versus 14.3%; HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.30; 0.34% versus 0.77%; HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.15 to 1.54; and 8.5% versus 7.3%; HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.68). The interactions between creatinine clearance and randomized treatment on any of the outcome variables were nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: In acute coronary syndrome patients with chronic kidney disease, ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel significantly reduces ischemic end points and mortality without a significant increase in major bleeding but with numerically more non-procedure-related bleeding. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL:http://www.clinicatrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00391872.
“A large proportion of patients with MI also have kidney disease and these results show that ticagrelor, as compared to clopidogrel, was associated with significantly lower risk of ischaemic outcomes in patients with moderate renal dysfunction.”
James et al. (Tue,) conducted a rct in Acute coronary syndromes (n=15,202). Ticagrelor vs. Clopidogrel was evaluated on Composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in patients with chronic kidney disease (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.90). In ACS patients with chronic kidney disease, ticagrelor reduced cardiovascular death, MI, and stroke compared with clopidogrel (17.3% vs 22.0%; HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.65-0.90).