Key result
Treatment with fimasartan remarkably reduced mortality to 36.0% compared to 96.0% with vehicle in a terfenadine-induced zebrafish model of heart failure.
Why the study?
Angiotensin II initially maintains cardiac output in the failing heart but ultimately accelerates deterioration, prompting investigation into RAAS modulation via fimasartan in an arrhythmia-induced zebrafish heart failure model.
Does fimasartan improve hemodynamics and survival in a zebrafish model of arrhythmia-induced heart failure?
Does fimasartan improve hemodynamics and survival in a zebrafish model of arrhythmia-induced heart failure?
Absolute Event Rate: 36% vs 96%
p-value: p=<0.001
Fimasartan protects against the progression of heart failure and improves survival in a zebrafish model of arrhythmia-induced heart failure.
Hypothesis-generating in zebrafish HF; leaves open translation to mammals or patients.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Angiotensin II in the failing heart initially helps to maintain cardiac output and blood pressure, but ultimately accelerates its deterioration. In this study, we established a model of arrhythmia-induced heart failure (HF) in zebrafish and investigated the role of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) modulation by using an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker, fimasartan, through the assessment of cellular and physiologic responses, morbidity, and mortality. METHODS: HF was induced in zebrafish larvae by exposure to 20 μM terfenadine. Morphologic, physiologic, and functional parameters were assessed in the presence or absence of fimasartan treatment. RESULTS: Zebrafish exposed to terfenadine showed marked dilatation of the ventricle and reduced systolic function. Treatment with terfenadine was associated with 10-fold higher expression of atrial natriuretic peptide (p < 0.001 vs. vehicle), increased p53 mRNA expression, and chromatin fragmentation in the TUNEL assay, all of which were significantly reduced by fimasartan treatment. Moreover, fimasartan improved fractional shortening (terfenadine + fimasartan 16.9% ± 3.1% vs. terfenadine + vehicle 11.4% ± 5.6%, p < 0.05) and blood flow (terfenadine + fimasartan 479.1 ± 124.1 nL/sec vs. terfenadine + vehicle 273.0 ± 109.0 nL/sec, p < 0.05). Finally, treatment with fimasartan remarkably reduced mortality (terfenadine + fimasartan 36.0% vs. terfenadine + vehicle 96.0%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Fimasartan effectively protected against the progression of HF in zebrafish by improving hemodynamic indices, which improved survival. A reduction in apoptotic cell death and an improvement in hemodynamics may be the mechanisms behind these effects. Further human studies are warranted to evaluate the possible role of fimasartan in the treatment of HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Quan et al. (2020) studied Terfenadine-induced heart failure. Fimasartan vs. Vehicle (0.1% DMSO) was evaluated on Mortality (p=<0.001). Treatment with fimasartan remarkably reduced mortality to 36.0% compared to 96.0% with vehicle in a terfenadine-induced zebrafish model of heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: