Key result
Early ED discharge on rivaroxaban for low-risk pulmonary embolism reduced initial hospital length of stay compared to standard of care (mean difference -28.8 hours; 95% CI -42.55 to -15.12).
Why the study?
Does early ED discharge on rivaroxaban reduce hospital hours in adult patients with low-risk pulmonary embolism?
RCT (n=114)
Open-label
randomized
Yes
Does early ED discharge on rivaroxaban reduce hospital hours in adult patients with low-risk pulmonary embolism?
Mean Difference: -28.8 (95% CI -42.55–-15.12)
Absolute Event Rate: 4.8% vs 33.6%
Early ED discharge on rivaroxaban for low-risk PE significantly reduces hospital length of stay and costs without increasing adverse events compared to standard of care.
Supports early ED discharge on rivaroxaban for low-risk PE; extends RCT evidence for shorter stays and lower costs.
BACKGROUND: Hospitalization for low-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) is common, expensive, and of questionable benefit. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine if low-risk PE patients discharged from the emergency department (ED) on rivaroxaban require fewer hospital days compared to standard of care (SOC). METHODS: Multicenter, open-label randomized trial in low-risk PE defined by Hestia criteria. Adult subjects were randomized to early ED discharge on rivaroxaban or SOC. Primary outcome was total number of initial hospital hours, plus hours of hospitalization for bleeding or venous thromboembolism (VTE), 30 days after randomization. A 90-day composite safety endpoint was defined as major bleeding, clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, and mortality. RESULTS: Of 114 randomized subjects, 51 were early discharge and 63 were SOC. Of 112 (98.2%) receiving at least one dose of study drug, 99 (86.8%) completed the study. Initial hospital LOS was 4.8 hours versus 33.6 hours, with a mean difference of -28.8 hours (95% confidence interval [CI] = -42.55 to -15.12 hours) for early discharge versus SOC, respectively. At 90 days, mean total hospital days (for any reason) were less for early discharge than SOC, 19.2 hours versus 43.2 hours, with a mean difference of 26.4 hours (95% CI = -46.97 to -3.34 hours). At 90 days, there were no bleeding events, recurrent VTE, or deaths. The composite safety endpoint was similar in both groups, with a difference in proportions of 0.005 (95% CI = -0.18 to 0.19). Total costs were $1,496 for early discharge and $4,234 for SOC, with a median difference of $2,496 (95% CI = -$2,999 to -$2,151). CONCLUSIONS: Low-risk ED PE patients receiving early discharge on rivaroxaban have similar outcomes to SOC, but fewer total hospital days and lower costs over 30 days.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peacock et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in Low-risk pulmonary embolism (n=114). Early ED discharge on rivaroxaban vs. Standard of care (SOC) was evaluated on Total number of initial hospital hours, plus hours of hospitalization for bleeding or venous thromboembolism (VTE), 30 days after randomization (MD -28.8 hours, 95% CI -42.55 to -15.12). Early ED discharge on rivaroxaban for low-risk pulmonary embolism reduced initial hospital length of stay compared to standard of care (mean difference -28.8 hours; 95% CI -42.55 to -15.12).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: