Key result
The modified protocol of transesophageal atrial pacing increased the diagnostic accuracy of stress echocardiography from 80% to 86% compared to the standard protocol in patients with ischemic heart disease.
Why the study?
The authors sought to develop a modified transesophageal atrial electric stimulation protocol to enhance the diagnostic value of stress echocardiography and shorten test duration in ischemic heart disease.
Does a modified protocol for transesophageal atrial electric stimulation in stress echocardiography improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce test duration in patients with suspected or documented ischemic heart disease?
Observational (n=101)
No
Does a modified protocol for transesophageal atrial electric stimulation in stress echocardiography improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce test duration in patients with suspected or documented ischemic heart disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 86% vs 80%
A modified transesophageal atrial pacing protocol for stress echocardiography improves diagnostic accuracy for ischemic heart disease while significantly reducing test duration.
Modified TEAES protocol may improve stress echocardiography accuracy in suspected IHD; leaves open confirmation in larger trials before adoption.
Aim To develop a new, modified protocol for transesophageal atrial electric stimulation (TEAES), which would significantly enhance the diagnostic value of stress echocardiography and reduce the duration of the test in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD).Material and methods This study included 101 patients (80 men and 21 women aged 55±9 years) with suspected or documented diagnosis of IHD who were divided into two homogenous groups. Group 1 (51 patients) underwent stress echocardiography (stress-EchoCG) according to a standard protocol (SP) for TEAES and group 2 (50 patients), underwent stress-EchoCG according to a modified protocol (MP). In addition to stress-EchoCG with TEAES, selective coronary angiography was performed for all patients. The development of the new method for evaluating occult coronary insufficiency was based on comparison of SP and MP for TEAES with stress-EchoCG with data of coronary angiography.Results In both groups, significant differences in values of systolic and diastolic blood pressure were absent. However, the values of achieved heart rate were significantly different: 141±11 (TEAES SP) and 155±10 (TEAES MP) bpm (p=0.01). There was also a difference in the duration of the TEAES protocols: 15±3 and 5±2 min, respectively (p=0.006). The use of the modified TEAES protocol for detecting transient disorders of left ventricular myocardial local contractility increased the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the test from 76 %, 87 %, and 80 % to 83 %, 92 %, and 86 %, respectively. The most significant differences were found in the area supplied by the circumflex artery: the SP and MP sensitivities were 63 % and 75 %, respectively (p<0.05) and the SP and MP accuracies were 81 % and 90 %, respectively (p<0.05).Conclusion Evaluation of occult coronary insufficiency by stress-EchoCG with the TEAES MP as compared to the TEAES SP provides a gentler procedure regimen for the patient due to a shorter duration of the test and at the same time improves the diagnostic significance of this method in IHD patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Саидова et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Ischemic heart disease (n=101). Modified protocol of transesophageal atrial pacing vs. Standard protocol of transesophageal atrial pacing was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy for detecting transient left ventricular wall motion abnormalities. The modified protocol of transesophageal atrial pacing increased the diagnostic accuracy of stress echocardiography from 80% to 86% compared to the standard protocol in patients with ischemic heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: