Key result
Coronary sinus venoplasty facilitates successful CRT in a systemic sclerosis patient, improving LVEF by ~10%.
Why the study?
Anatomical variance of the coronary sinus can create technical difficulties for advancing the left ventricular lead during cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Case Report (n=1)
Anatomical variances such as fibrous tissue in the coronary sinus can obstruct left ventricular lead placement during CRT, highlighting the need for appropriate imaging in difficult cases.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy is an essential tool for treating patients with heart failure in different types of dilatative cardiomyopathy with bundle branch block. This technique is wildly used with significant benefits in terms of quality of life and effort tolerability along with optimized medical therapy. In spite of its benefits, several factors may influence its efficacy such as etiology, lead position, or device settings. In some cases, the anatomical variance of the coronary sinus could create technical difficulties for advancing the left ventricular lead. This case report describes a female patient presenting with decompensated heart failure, known with complicated sclerosis multiplex and a fibrous tissue in the coronary sinus, which created a critical obstruction leading to impossibility to advance the left ventricular lead. This case underlines the importance of appropriate imaging investigation for optimal interventional approach in these difficult cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parajkó et al. (2023) conducted a case report in Decompensated heart failure and systemic sclerosis (n=1). Cardiac resynchronization therapy and coronary sinus venoplasty was evaluated on QRS duration and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF). Cardiac resynchronization therapy facilitated by coronary sinus venoplasty successfully shortened QRS duration from 162 ms to 122 ms and improved LVEF from 30% to 40% in a patient with systemic sclerosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: