Key result
Among coronary heart disease patients with elevated anxiety or depression, 48% met criteria for PTSD, and negative metacognitive beliefs were strongly associated with PTSD caseness (RR 1.30).
Why the study?
Post-traumatic stress symptoms in coronary heart disease are associated with increased mortality, but data on PTSD prevalence and metacognitive mechanisms in cardiac rehabilitation were needed.
Cross-Sectional (n=572)
Yes
PTSD symptoms are highly prevalent in patients attending cardiac rehabilitation with elevated anxiety/depression, and metacognitive beliefs about the uncontrollability and danger of worry are strongly associated with PTSD severity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High PTSD prevalence in screened CR patients supports routine assessment; extends metacognitive risk marker evidence but leaves causal tests open.
Introduction: Anxiety and depression in coronary heart disease (CHD) are associated with poorer health outcomes, greater healthcare use and reduced quality of life. Post-traumatic stress symptoms may be a particular concern as they are associated with increased mortality at follow-up. We examined prevalence of PTSD in patients with elevated anxiety/depression scores referred for cardiac rehabilitation (CR) across seven NHS sites in North-West England. We tested a possible mechanism (metacognition) linking CHD to PTSD symptom severity as implicated in the metacognitive model. Methods: = 572) with at least mild symptoms of anxiety and depression under routine screening (assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and attending CR were eligible for the study. A battery of questionnaires, including assessment of demographic variables, PTSD symptoms (using the IES-R) and metacognitive beliefs was administered prior to random allocation and intervention delivery. Results: Rates of PTSD were high, with 48% of patients meeting threshold for PTSD and a further 15% partial PTSD. All five metacognition subscales were positively associated with PTSD vs. no PTSD, with beliefs about the uncontrollability and danger of worry and beliefs about need to control thoughts being most strongly related. For every unit increase in uncontrollability and danger metacognitions the odds of being in the PTSD group increased 30%, whilst the odds of partial PTSD increased 16%. Stepwise regression analysis using the metacognitive subscales along with demographic and health-related covariates found that uncontrollability/danger and need for control metacognitions explained unique variation in PTSD symptom severity, with unique contributions also for age, sex, and number of comorbidities. Conclusion: PTSD symptoms appeared highly prevalent in the current CR sample. Metacognitive beliefs were individually associated with symptom severity with the strongest positive relationship observed for beliefs about uncontrollability and dangerousness of worry, followed by need to control thoughts. The results highlight the importance in assessing PTSD in CR patients and add support to implementing metacognitive therapy in CHD to target particular metacognition risk factors in anxiety, depression and PTSD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wells et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary heart disease with elevated anxiety or depression (n=572). Dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs (uncontrollability and danger) vs. Lower dysfunctional metacognitive belief scores was evaluated on PTSD caseness (IES-R ≥33) (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.23-1.38, p=<0.001). Among coronary heart disease patients with elevated anxiety or depression, 48% met criteria for PTSD, and negative metacognitive beliefs were strongly associated with PTSD caseness (RR 1.30).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: