Key result
CASCADE outlines an observational study comparing buffered versus enteric-coated ASA for HRPR in CAD and T2D.
Why the study?
Enteric-coated ASA has reduced bioavailability and antiplatelet efficacy compared with conventional ASA, and whether ASA absorbed in the stomach is more effective in patients with T2D and stable CAD requires investigation.
Does gastro-soluble acetylsalicylic acid reduce high residual platelet reactivity compared to enteric-soluble acetylsalicylic acid in patients with stable coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes?
Observational (n=200)
No
Does gastro-soluble acetylsalicylic acid reduce high residual platelet reactivity compared to enteric-soluble acetylsalicylic acid in patients with stable coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes?
The CASCADE study is designed to evaluate whether gastro-soluble aspirin provides better antiplatelet efficacy than enteric-coated aspirin in patients with stable CAD and type 2 diabetes.
Should not alter aspirin formulation selection in T2D with CAD; leaves open whether conventional forms reduce HRPR in prospective trials.
Aim . Enteric-coated acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is released more slowly and is absorbed in smaller quantities and over a longer period of time, which may lead to bioavailability and antiplatelet effect decrease compared to conventional ASA. Patients with diabetes are characterized by increased platelet reactivity and a reduced pharmacodynamic response to ASA compared to individuals without diabetes. It seems rational to test the hypothesis that the use of ASA absorbed in the stomach may be more effective in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) and stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Material and methods . This single-center, non-interventional comparative study will randomly select 200 adult patients of both sexes with stable CAD and T2D who were routinely prescribed a gastro-soluble ASA (Cardiomagnyl 75 mg/day) or an enteric-soluble ASA (Aspirin® Cardio 100 mg/day or Thrombo ASS® 100 mg/day) before inclusion in the study. According to the routinely prescribed therapy, patients will be divided into 2 following groups: patients taking Cardiomagnyl 75 mg/day and patients taking Aspirin® Cardio 100 mg/day or Thrombo ASS® 100 mg/day. The primary endpoint is the incidence of high residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) while taking ASA (resistance to ASA) according to the VerifyNow Aspirin Test. Conclusion . CASCADE is the first study to evaluate the HRPR using the VerifyNow Aspirin Test in patients with stable CAD and T2D.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kobalava et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Stable coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes (n=200). Buffered acetylsalicylic acid vs. Enteric-coated acetylsalicylic acid 100 mg/day was evaluated on Incidence of high residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) according to the VerifyNow Aspirin Test. The CASCADE study is a rationale and design paper describing an observational trial to compare the incidence of high residual platelet reactivity between buffered and enteric-coated aspirin in patients with stable CAD and T2D.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: