Key result
Transpulmonary thermodilution accurately assessed cardiac output during exercise in healthy men compared to indocyanine green dilution (r = 0.95, P < 0.001; mean difference 0.06 l/min).
Why the study?
Is transpulmonary thermodilution accurate and reproducible compared to indocyanine green dilution for assessing cardiac output during exercise in healthy men?
Cross-Sectional (n=16)
Is transpulmonary thermodilution accurate and reproducible compared to indocyanine green dilution for assessing cardiac output during exercise in healthy men?
Transpulmonary thermodilution is an accurate and reproducible method for assessing cardiac output and other hemodynamic parameters during exercise in humans.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support TPTd for exercise CO assessment in research settings; leaves open validation in patients.
The accuracy and reproducibility of transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTd) to assess cardiac output (Q̇) in exercising men was determined using indocyanine green (ICG) dilution as a reference method. TPTd has been utilized for the assessment of Q̇ and preload indexes of global end-diastolic volume and intrathoracic blood volume, as well as extravascular lung water (EVLW) in resting humans. It remains unknown if this technique is also accurate and reproducible during exercise. Sixteen healthy men underwent catheterization of the right femoral vein (for iced saline injection), an antecubital vein (ICG injection), and femoral artery (thermistor) to determine their Q̇ by TPTd and ICG concentration during incremental one- and two-legged pedaling on a cycle ergometer and combined arm cranking with leg pedaling to exhaustion. There was a close relationship between TPTd-Q̇ and ICG-Q̇ (r = 0.95, n = 151, standard error of the estimate: 1.452 l/min, P < 0.001; mean difference of 0.06 l/min; limits of agreement -2.98 to 2.86 l/min), and TPTd-Q̇ and ICG-Q̇ increased linearly with oxygen uptake with similar intercepts and slopes. Both methods had mean coefficients of variation close to 5% for Q̇, global end-diastolic volume, and intrathoracic blood volume. The mean coefficient of variation of EVLW, assessed with both indicators (ICG and thermal) was 17% and was sensitive enough to detect a reduction in EVLW of 107 ml when changing from resting supine to upright exercise. In summary, TPTd with bolus injection into the femoral vein is an accurate and reproducible method to assess Q̇ during exercise in humans.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Calbet et al. (2014) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=16). Transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTd) vs. Indocyanine green (ICG) dilution was evaluated on Cardiac output (Q̇) (MD 0.06 l/min, p=<0.001). Transpulmonary thermodilution accurately assessed cardiac output during exercise in healthy men compared to indocyanine green dilution (r = 0.95, P < 0.001; mean difference 0.06 l/min).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: