Key result
Constant infusion transpulmonary thermodilution accurately measured cardiac output during exercise but systematically overestimated it by 1.64 L/min compared to indocyanine green dilution.
Why the study?
Does constant infusion transpulmonary thermodilution accurately and precisely measure cardiac output compared to indocyanine green dilution and bolus transpulmonary thermodilution in exercising humans?
Observational (n=15)
No
Does constant infusion transpulmonary thermodilution accurately and precisely measure cardiac output compared to indocyanine green dilution and bolus transpulmonary thermodilution in exercising humans?
Constant infusion transpulmonary thermodilution is a precise and accurate method for determining cardiac output in exercising humans, though it slightly overestimates values at lower exercise intensities.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CITT-Q accurately measures cardiac output during exercise in healthy men; leaves open validation and clinical translation in patients.
To determine the accuracy and precision of constant infusion transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output (CITT-Q) assessment during exercise in humans, using indocyanine green (ICG) dilution and bolus transpulmonary thermodilution (BTD) as reference methods, cardiac output (Q) was determined at rest and during incremental one- and two-legged pedaling on a cycle ergometer, and combined arm cranking with leg pedaling to exhaustion in 15 healthy men. Continuous infusions of iced saline in the femoral vein (n = 41) or simultaneously in the femoral and axillary (n = 66) veins with determination of temperature in the femoral artery were used for CITT-Q assessment. CITT-Q was linearly related to ICG-Q (r = 0.82, CITT-Q = 0.876 × ICG-Q + 3.638, P < 0.001; limits of agreement ranging from -1.43 to 3.07 L/min) and BTD-Q (r = 0.91, CITT-Q = 0.822 × BTD + 4.481 L/min, P < 0.001; limits of agreement ranging from -1.01 to 2.63 L/min). Compared with ICG-Q and BTD-Q, CITT-Q overestimated cardiac output by 1.6 L/min (≈ 10% of the mean ICG and BTD-Q values, P < 0.05). For Q between 20 and 28 L/min, we estimated an overestimation < 5%. The coefficient of variation of 23 repeated CITT-Q measurements was 6.0% (CI: 6.1-11.1%). In conclusion, cardiac output can be precisely and accurately determined with constant infusion transpulmonary thermodilution in exercising humans.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Calbet et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=15). Constant infusion transpulmonary thermodilution (CITT-Q) vs. Indocyanine green (ICG) dilution was evaluated on Difference in cardiac output measurement between CITT-Q and ICG-Q (MD 1.64 L/min, 95% CI 1.1-2.2, p=<0.001). Constant infusion transpulmonary thermodilution accurately measured cardiac output during exercise but systematically overestimated it by 1.64 L/min compared to indocyanine green dilution.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: