Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Framework evaluates economic feasibility of flexible resources versus infrastructure investment for utilities, suggesting efficient strategies.
As load growth and renewable energy integration continue to expand in distribution network, utilities face increasing challenges in reinforcing network infrastructure. Consequently, flexible resources such as ESS and DR have been introduced as NWAs. However, the economic contributions of these diverse resource configurations and their operational strategies have not been systematically evaluated for distribution network planning. Therefore, this paper proposes a framework for evaluating the economic feasibility between utilizing flexible resources such as ESS or DR and investing in distribution facilities, aiming to mitigate distribution network constraints. In particular, it is analyzed short-term and long-term operational strategies based on ESS, DR, and mixed DR/ESS configurations. This economic analysis framework can be used to support flexible resource allocation strategies and distribution facility investment plans in distribution network planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hwang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: