Randomized trial examines inhibitory control development in children, suggesting distinct trajectories for response and interference inhibition.
This study examined inhibitory control development across two samples of Chinese children: a cross-sectional (n = 1,122; 45.5% female; 91.9% Han; Mage=12.42 years, range: 6.0–18.7 years) with 6-month longitudinal follow-up and independent validation sample (n = 1,026; 45.1% female; 90.8% Han; Mage=12.44 years, range: 6.1–18.8 years). Generalized additive models applied to Stroop and Go/No-Go tasks revealed four-phase nonlinear developmental trajectories. Response inhibition stabilized by 13.4 years, while interference inhibition developed until 15.8 years. Hierarchical drift diffusion modeling indicated that interference inhibition development was associated with enhanced information accumulation (drift rate), whereas response inhibition development was associated with response bias adjustment (starting point), with shared processing speed improvements—a dissociation emerging across development. These findings support a decision-computational framework for understanding inhibitory control development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: