Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study evaluates virological and immunological outcomes in treatment-naive HIV patients with high viral loads, suggesting effective long-term treatment options.
Introduction Data on the long-term real-world efficacy of elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (E/C/F/TAF) in people living with HIV (PLWH) presenting with high baseline viral loads remain limited. This study aimed to assess the virological and immunological efficacy of E/C/F/TAF in treatment-naive patients stratified by baseline viremia levels. Methods This retrospective, single-center, observational study evaluated 67 treatment-naive adult patients who initiated E/C/F/TAF therapy between 2017 and 2018. Patients were stratified into three baseline viral load strata: low (<100,000 copies/mL; n=41), high (100,000 to <1,000,000 copies/mL; n=15), and very high (≥1,000,000 copies/mL; n=11). Virological suppression kinetics and absolute CD4+ T cell counts were longitudinally analyzed over a 24-month follow-up period using available-case analysis. Results Overall virological suppression was achieved in 85.1% (57/67) of patients at month six. Stratified analysis at month six revealed a statistically significant difference in early suppression rates: 97.6% (40/41) in the low, 73.3% (11/15) in the high, and 54.5% (6/11) in the very high strata (p<0.001). However, this disparity progressively narrowed; by month 12, suppression rates reached 100.0% (40/40) in the low, 86.7% (13/15) in the high, and 90.9% (10/11) in the very high strata (p=0.06), maintaining statistical similarity through month 24 (p=0.16), where 100.0% of the low (40/40) and high (14/14) strata, and 90.0% (9/10) of the very high stratum achieved suppression. Only one patient (baseline viral load: 3,393,215 copies/mL) exhibited persistent low-level viremia, which gradually declined to 114 copies/mL at month 12 and 54 copies/mL at month 24. Immunologically, the mean absolute CD4+ T cell count for the entire cohort expanded significantly from 414.1±254.8 cells/µL at baseline to 730.4±308.3 cells/µL at month 24. Linear mixed-effects modeling demonstrated a significant overall increase in CD4+ counts over time (p<0.001) and a significant time-by-group interaction (p=0.013), confirming an accelerated 'catch-up' immune recovery in the very high viral load stratum by month 24. Conclusions E/C/F/TAF was associated with durable long-term virological and immunological responses in treatment-naive PLWH, including those with high baseline viremia. Although high pre-treatment viral load was associated with a transient delay in early viral suppression at month six, this did not appear to compromise longer-term treatment outcomes. These findings suggest that E/C/F/TAF may represent a useful treatment option, particularly in clinical settings where second-generation integrase inhibitors are restricted or unavailable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Belik et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: