Analyzes short-range randomness effects on band broadening in chromatography beds, suggesting significant implications for performance.
We have for the first time applied the recently developed Brenner formalism-based two-zone moment analysis (TZMA) method for chromatographic band broadening to a unit cell containing randomly packed fully porous spheres instead of containing only perfectly ordered packings, as in previous literature reports. In total, 4 random packings have been simulated. Each containing 100 fully porous spheres, they can be considered a good proxy for the short-range randomness appearing in randomly packed chromatography beds. Compared to the minimal plate height h min in real packed columns, the h min produced by these random packings is roughly only half ( h min ≅ 1 at k ″ = 4). This must imply that the band broadening in state-of-the-art packed bed columns originates for about 50% from the polydispersity of the particles and from the long-range, column-wall-induced transversal packing density variations, two effects that are not included in the present study. The data further show that, if also the short-range randomness could be eliminated, plate heights would drop by another 30%, i.e., decrease to h min = 0.7 at k ″ = 4. Covering a broad range of Péclet-values (1 ≤ Pe ≤ 800) and zone retention factors k ″ (0.5 ≤ k ″ ≤ 16), a model for the mobile zone dispersion occurring at the short-range randomness scale could be proposed. The model only contains 4 fitting parameters and consists of a logarithmic term (linked to the randomness of the packing) and a local mass transfer term (linked to the dispersion occurring at the level of a single through-pore). Unlike other models used in the literature, the model contains an explicit dependency on the retention factor k ″ such that the strong effect of the latter on the short-range eddy dispersion can be rightfully accounted for.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moussa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: