Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Quantitative study analyzes digital literacy skills among high school students, indicating areas for improvement.
Digital literacy has become a fundamental competency for students in the 21st century, particularly in supporting effective learning processes. However, disparities in students' abilities to search, evaluate, and utilize digital information remain a critical issue in secondary education. This study aims to analyze the level of digital literacy among Grade X high school students in Yogyakarta, focusing on key indicators of information literacy skills. This research employed a quantitative descriptive approach involving students from several high schools. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire based on six indicators: searching for information, using multiple sources, selecting information sources, evaluating information, considering source/message effects, and producing original work. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistical techniques to determine percentage scores and category levels. The results indicate that students demonstrate relatively strong abilities in searching for information (65.1%), using multiple sources (62.5%), and considering source/message effects (61.2%), all categorized as high. Meanwhile, competencies in selecting information sources (55.8%), evaluating information (51.3%), and producing original work (54.8%) fall within the moderate category. The overall average score of digital literacy is 58.5%, indicating a moderate level of proficiency. In conclusion, while students show strength in accessing and gathering information, their higher-order digital literacy skills—particularly in evaluation and content creation—require further development. These findings highlight the need for targeted instructional strategies to enhance critical and productive digital competencies in secondary education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Irawati et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: