What is the clinical evidence from this study?

Study design: Other. Population: non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) (n=154). Intervention: Early ambulation vs. Complete rest in bed (CRIB). Primary outcome: Cardiac events (angina, reinfarction, dyspnoea and syncope) (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.07-0.60, p=0.003).

What does this research mean for the field?

Early ambulation before percutaneous coronary intervention in NSTEMI patients is safe, reduces cardiac events by 79%, and significantly shortens hospital stays compared to complete bed rest. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.NOVEL_FINDING. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

July 9, 2026Journal of research in nursing

Early ambulation before angioplasty in NSTEMI cuts cardiac events ~79% versus complete bed rest.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Why the study?

The effects of early ambulation on haemodynamic stability and clinical outcomes in NSTEMI patients before coronary angioplasty are unexplored.

Does early ambulation reduce cardiac events and improve haemodynamic stability in NSTEMI patients before coronary angioplasty?

Population

154 NSTEMI patients before coronary angioplasty

Comparison

Early ambulation vs complete rest in bed

Design

Quasi-experimental study in two cardiac wards

Key result

Early ambulation before coronary angioplasty in NSTEMI patients significantly reduced cardiac events compared to complete rest in bed (OR 0.21; 95% CI 0.07-0.60; p=0.003).

Authors

SCSi-Ying Chin CLChoy Yee Lee TYTee Joo Yeo

Discussion

Member takes

Overview

Supports early ambulation before angioplasty in NSTEMI; extends mobilization benefits to this pre-procedure setting.

Key Points

This study aims to evaluate the impact of early ambulation on haemodynamic stability and clinical outcomes in NSTEMI patients before coronary angioplasty.
Quasi-experimental study design with 154 NSTEMI patients in two cardiac wards.
Patients were assigned to early ambulation (n=77) or complete rest in bed (CRIB) (n=77).
Haemodynamic parameters and clinical events were monitored and analyzed using logistic regression.
Early ambulation reduced cardiac events by 79% (OR = 0.21, 95% CI (0.07, 0.60), p = 0.003).
A trend toward fewer telemetry events was observed (OR = 0.27, 95% CI (0.07, 1.03), p = 0.06).
Hospitalization was shortened by an average of 49.56 hours (p = 0.02).

Structured PICO

Does early ambulation reduce cardiac events and improve haemodynamic stability in NSTEMI patients before coronary angioplasty?

Population

154 NSTEMI patients before coronary angioplasty assigned to early ambulation or complete rest in bed.

Intervention

Early ambulation (EA) before coronary angioplasty

Comparator

Complete rest in bed (CRIB)

Outcome

Haemodynamic stability and cardiac events (composite of angina, reinfarction, dyspnoea, and syncope)composite

Main Result

Odds Ratio: 0.21 (95% CI 0.07–0.6)

p-value: p=0.003

Early ambulation before coronary angioplasty in NSTEMI patients is safe, significantly reduces cardiac events, and shortens hospital stay compared to complete bed rest.

Cite This Study

Chin et al. (2026) studied non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) (n=154). Early ambulation vs. Complete rest in bed (CRIB) was evaluated on Cardiac events (angina, reinfarction, dyspnoea and syncope) (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.07-0.60, p=0.003). Early ambulation before coronary angioplasty in NSTEMI patients significantly reduced cardiac events compared to complete rest in bed (OR 0.21; 95% CI 0.07-0.60; p=0.003).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a4f3c8a2b81a944af575deb https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871261421460

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

July 9, 2026Journal of research in nursing

Early ambulation before angioplasty in NSTEMI cuts cardiac events ~79% versus complete bed rest.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Why the study?

The effects of early ambulation on haemodynamic stability and clinical outcomes in NSTEMI patients before coronary angioplasty are unexplored.

Does early ambulation reduce cardiac events and improve haemodynamic stability in NSTEMI patients before coronary angioplasty?

Population

154 NSTEMI patients before coronary angioplasty

Comparison

Early ambulation vs complete rest in bed

Design

Quasi-experimental study in two cardiac wards

Key result

Early ambulation before coronary angioplasty in NSTEMI patients significantly reduced cardiac events compared to complete rest in bed (OR 0.21; 95% CI 0.07-0.60; p=0.003).

Authors

SCSi-Ying Chin CLChoy Yee Lee TYTee Joo Yeo

Discussion

Member takes

Overview

Supports early ambulation before angioplasty in NSTEMI; extends mobilization benefits to this pre-procedure setting.

Key Points

This study aims to evaluate the impact of early ambulation on haemodynamic stability and clinical outcomes in NSTEMI patients before coronary angioplasty.
Quasi-experimental study design with 154 NSTEMI patients in two cardiac wards.
Patients were assigned to early ambulation (n=77) or complete rest in bed (CRIB) (n=77).
Haemodynamic parameters and clinical events were monitored and analyzed using logistic regression.
Early ambulation reduced cardiac events by 79% (OR = 0.21, 95% CI (0.07, 0.60), p = 0.003).
A trend toward fewer telemetry events was observed (OR = 0.27, 95% CI (0.07, 1.03), p = 0.06).
Hospitalization was shortened by an average of 49.56 hours (p = 0.02).

Structured PICO

Does early ambulation reduce cardiac events and improve haemodynamic stability in NSTEMI patients before coronary angioplasty?

Population

154 NSTEMI patients before coronary angioplasty assigned to early ambulation or complete rest in bed.

Intervention

Early ambulation (EA) before coronary angioplasty

Comparator

Complete rest in bed (CRIB)

Outcome

Haemodynamic stability and cardiac events (composite of angina, reinfarction, dyspnoea, and syncope)composite

Main Result

Odds Ratio: 0.21 (95% CI 0.07–0.6)

p-value: p=0.003

Early ambulation before coronary angioplasty in NSTEMI patients is safe, significantly reduces cardiac events, and shortens hospital stay compared to complete bed rest.

Cite This Study

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a4f3c8a2b81a944af575deb https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871261421460

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark